The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, April 1865
History
The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, April 1865
Catholic Church -- Ireland -- Periodicals; Catholic Church -- Periodicals
When they came to treat of the
convention, and when the Cardinal disavowed the proceedings of Mgr.
Caleppi, Murat gave a signal proof of his affection for Pius VII. It was
in his power to insist on the ratification of the treaty, and to inform
Bonaparte of the Pope's refusal; but he preferred to lose the credit
he could have won for himself by such an act, and after employing many
arguments to shake the Pope's resolution, he at length exclaimed: "Well,
then, since this treaty is a source of so much trouble to the Holy Father
and to you, let us throw it into the fire, and say no more about it".
Soon after this occurrence Consalvi went to Paris to negociate the
Concordat. After the ratification of the French Concordat came the
discussion of the Italian Concordat for the kingdom of Italy. What the
organic laws were to the French Concordat, the decrees of the President
Melzi became to the Italian one. The Emperor's decrees--which, while they
appeared to revoke those of Melzi in deference to the Pope's opposition,
in reality confirmed them--completely frustrated the good effects of
the Concordat. The difficulties of these two negociations were hardly
over when the marriage of the Emperor's brother Jerome was a source
of fresh trouble to the Holy See. Napoleon urged the Pope to declare
null the marriage his brother had contracted in America without the
consent of his mother or his brother. Cardinal Fesch, the Emperor's
uncle, was charged with the management of this affair, and spared no
importunities to extort from the Pope the desired decision. The whole
question hinged on this: could the Emperor prove that the decrees of the
Council of Trent had been published at Baltimore, where the marriage
was contracted? If proof of this were forthcoming, the Pope would at
once declare the marriage null and void; but if it could not be proved,
then the marriage was perfectly valid, seeing that the defect of the
consent of the parents was not an _impedimentum dirimens_, but only a
civil disability in the eyes of the French law. The Cardinal relates
that in the many letters written by the Emperor to the Pope during the
course of this affair, he frequently insisted, and with extreme energy,
on the fact that his brother's spouse was a Protestant, and he censured
in the most abusive language the Pontiff, who, as he said, was desirous
of maintaining a heretic in a family every member of which was destined
to mount a throne. The Pope's reply was, that although this difference
of religion rendered the marriage unlawful, yet it did not make it
invalid. After these letters, who could believe that as soon as the
ecclesiastical authorities at Paris had declared the American marriage
null and void, the Emperor would make Jerome marry another Protestant,
the daughter of the King of Wurtemberg, and afterwards Queen of
Westphalia?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account