The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, February, 1865
History
The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, February, 1865
Catholic Church -- Ireland -- Periodicals; Catholic Church -- Periodicals
The votes and arguments of Dr. O'Hart are especially commemorated in the
acts of the subsequent sessions of the Council. Thus, on the question of
ecclesiastical jurisdiction, some were anxious to expressly define that
episcopal jurisdiction was derived immediately from God. This opinion,
however, was warmly impugned by the Bishop of Achonry, who assigned the
three following motives for rejecting it:--"1st, Were this jurisdiction
derived immediately from God, we would have innumerable independent
sources of authority, which would lead to anarchy and confusion. 2nd,
Such an opinion leads towards the heretical tenets, and seems to favour
the Anglican opinion, that the king is head of the Church, and that the
bishops being consecrated by three other bishops, receive their
authority from God. 3rd, Were such a doctrine once admitted, the
Sovereign Pontiff could not deprive bishops of their jurisdiction,
which is contrary to the prerogatives of the Holy See, and repugnant to
the primary notion of the Christian Church". The opinion of Dr. O'Hart
was embraced by almost all the other bishops, and the historian of the
council adds: "Quae sententia omnibus placere maxime visa fuit". Even
the Papal legates, when subsequently dealing with this controversy,
expressly refer to the reasoning of our bishop. On another occasion,
when the question of episcopal residence was discussed, an Irish bishop,
who was probably Dr. Eugene, stated the following curious fact:--
"Est necessarium ut Praelati intersint in conciliis regum et
principum, alias actum esset de religione in multis regnis.
Nam in Hibernia cum ageretur concilium reginae Mariae et duo
contenderent de Episcopatu, alter Catholicus, alter
haereticus, dixit advocatus Catholici, adversarium esse
repellendum quia obtinuit Episcopatum a rege schismatico
Henrico VIII.; tunc statim praefecti consilio judicaverunt
illium reum esse laesae majestatis. Ille respondit: rogo ut
me audiatis; nam si Henricus fuit Catholicus, necesse est ut
regina sit schismatica aut e contra; eligite ergo utrum
velitis. Tunc praefecti, his auditis, illum absolverunt et
eidem Episcopatum concesserunt".
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account