The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, March 1865
History
The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, March 1865
Catholic Church -- Ireland -- Periodicals; Catholic Church -- Periodicals
It is quite clear, notwithstanding the ingenious shifts of Dr.
Colenso, that the authors of the English Protestant version regarded
the word חֲמֻשִׁים (Chamushim) as one of obscure and doubtful meaning. In
the text it is here rendered _harnessed_, and elsewhere (_Jos._, i. 14;
_Jud._, vii. 11) _armed_. But in the margin a very different idea is
suggested,--"by five in a rank", "marshalled by five". The Septuagint is
by far the oldest translation we possess of the Hebrew text. It dates
almost from a time when the Hebrew was still a spoken language; and
therefore the biblical scholars by whom it was produced must have enjoyed
many advantages, which all the learning and research of modern times
cannot supply. No one, certainly, will maintain that, if the meaning
of an important Hebrew word were clear and certain, that meaning could
have remained unknown to the authors of this celebrated version. Yet
the seventy interpreters appear to have been curiously perplexed about
the very word on which Dr. Colenso is so flippant and so confident.
Four times it occurs in the text, and each time we find a different
translation. Nay, of the four translations, not one corresponds with
the translation of Dr. Colenso. First it is rendered _in the fifth
generation_--πέμπτῃ δὲ γενεᾷ (_Ex._, xiii. 18). Next, _girt as for a
journey_--εὔζωνοι (_Jos._, i. 14). Then, _prepared_, _furnished_--
διεσκευασμένοι (_Jos._, iv. 12). And in the fourth place it is translated
_of the fifty_--τῶν πεντήκοντα (_Jud._, vii. 11).
Perhaps, however, Dr. Colenso would appeal to the authority of modern
Hebrew scholars. If so, we can assure him he would appeal in vain. Amongst
lexicographers we may refer to GESENIUS. Under the root חָמֵשׁ (Chamash) we
find the following explanation:--"Hence, part. pass. plur. חֲמֻשִׁים (a word
the etymology of which has long been sought for) _i.e. the eager_,
_active_, _brave_, _ready prepared_ for fighting". Again, ROSENMÜLLER
in his Commentary, though he does not reject _armati_, seems to prefer
the interpretation generally adopted by the Jews, and supported by
the authority of their paraphrasts. Here are his words: "Nec igitur
rejiciendum, quod Hebraei חֲמֻשִׁים _ad quintam costam_;--_i.e._ circa
lumbos _accinctos_ proprie significare dicunt, et hoc Exodi loco
Israelitas dici exiisse expeditos et accinctos paratosque omnibus ad
iter necessariis. Quod ipsum expresserunt Onkelos et duo reliqui Chaldaei
paraphrastae", etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account