The Irish ecclesiastical record, Volume 1, September 1865
Religion
The Irish ecclesiastical record, Volume 1, September 1865
Catholic Church -- Ireland -- Periodicals; Catholic Church -- Periodicals
We are therefore clearly of opinion that no priest can on principle
omit the _De profundis_, and we would take the liberty of reminding
him of the munificent endowments established in former ages of the
Irish Church for the exclusive object of having Requiem Masses said,
and securing the suffrages of the faithful in aid of the suffering
souls in Purgatory. We would refer our readers, for information on
this point, to Dr. Lanigan’s _Ecclesiastical History of Ireland_, vol.
iii. chap. 21.
With regard to the proper time for saying the _De profundis_, we think
that the practice of saying it at the foot of the altar is the most
correct. We know this to be the course adopted by many priests, who
descend from the altar, make a genuflexion or a reverence to the
altar, and then standing recite the _De profundis_. By this plan it is
made manifest that the _De profundis_ is a thing quite distinct from
the Mass, and not appertaining to it. However, it is right to say that
nothing decisive can be laid down as to the place and time of reciting
it. There is a decree of the Sacred Congregation of Rites given by
Merati in his _Series Decretorum_, p. 436, which is as follows:
“Quando adest legatum quod sacerdos antequam discedat ab
altari, recitet aliquod Evangelium, Psalmum, seu orationem
post terminatam missam, debet oneri sibi injuncto
satisfacere post finem missae exutis vestibus sacerdotalibus
et cum sola cotta in altari vel in sacristia et sic legatum
adimplere S. R. C., 31 Augusti, 1669, in Conversanen”.
These words would appear to imply that in our case the sacred
vestments should be taken off. However, on referring to the decree
itself in Gardellini, we find its terms are not so comprehensive as
the interpretation of Merati would make them. The following are the
words:
“2339. Conversan. Capitulum Collegiatae Rosigliani Dioecesis
Conversanensis exposuit in S. R. C. Nicolaum _Franciscium in
ejus sub quo decessit testamento_, reliquisse ejus bona
dicto capitulo cum onere celebrandi Missam quotidianam et
singulis diebus veneris de Passione et cum onere, terminata
missa post Evangelium in principio erat verbum, etc.,
recitandi ipsam Passionem secundum Johannem. Et proinde cum
dicta dispositio sit contra Ritus Ecclesiasticos supplicavit
pro declaratione. An dicta passio recitanda sit post dictum
Evangelium alibi per celebrantem?
“Et S. eadem C. censuit: Recitandam esse post finem missae
exutis vestibus sacerdotalibus et cum sola cotta in altari
vel in sacristia. Hac die 31 Augusti, 1669”.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account