The Irish Penny Journal, Vol. 1 No. 48, May 29, 1841 — John Shaqi
The Irish Penny Journal, Vol. 1 No. 48, May 29, 1841Various
History
The Irish Penny Journal, Vol. 1 No. 48, May 29, 1841
Various
Ireland -- Periodicals
in the first place, that _Brin_ in the Welsh language means woody, and
that hence the O’Brins or O’Byrnes must be of Welsh origin. But admitting
that _Brin_ does in the Welsh language mean woody, what has that to do
with O’Brain, the original Irish name of O’Byrne, especially when it can
be proved that that surname was called after Bran, king of Leinster, who
was usually styled Bran Duv, _i. e._ the Black Raven, from the colour of
his hair, and his thirst for prey. Secondly, to prove that O’Toole is a
Welsh name, he says that _tol_ means hilly in the Welsh language! and so
does _tol_ in Irish bear this meaning. But what, I would ask, has that to
do with O’Tuathail, or descendants of Tuathal, the son of Ugaire, from
whom this family have taken their surname? The name Tuathal, signifying
_the lordly_, has no more to do with _tol_, a hill, than it has with the
English word _tool_, to which it has been anglicised for the last two
centuries. Thirdly, to prove that the name Cavanagh is of Welsh origin,
he asserts that Kaevan in Welsh signifies _strong_ in English. This may
be true; but what has the signification of the Welsh word Kaevan to do
with the name of the Mac Murroghs of Leinster, who assumed the cognomen
of Cavanagh from Donnell Cavanagh, the son of Dermot Mac Murrogh, who had
himself received this name from his having been fostered at Kilcavan in
the north-east of the present county of Wexford? _Spectatum admissi risum
teneatis amici?_
These errors of Spenser have been already exposed by Dr Jeffry Keating, a
man of learning and undoubted honesty, but of great simplicity, which is
characteristic of the age in which he lived, also by Gratianus Lucius,
and by the learned Roderic O’Flaherty, who has devoted a chapter of his
Ogygia to prove that Spenser, though a distinguished poet, can have no
claim to credit as a historian. Spenser’s purpose in fabricating this
story about the Mac Mahons was to hold them up as objects of hatred
to the Irish and English people, as being descended from the murderer
of Thomas à Becket. He never succeeded, however, in convincing Ever
Mac Cooley, or any other of the rebels of the Farney, that they were
descended from the Beares of England! Spenser also asserts that _it was
said_ that most of the surnames ending in _an_, though then considered
Irish, were in reality English, such as Hernan, Shinan, Mungan, &c. I
do not, however, believe a word of this latter assertion of the great
English poet, but conclude, with the simple and honest Keating, that, “as
being a poet, he gave himself, as was usual with the profession, licence
to revel in poetic fictions, which he dressed in flowery language to
decoy his reader.” For we know that there is not a single instance on
record of any Anglo-Norman family having taken any Irish names except
such as they formed from the names or titles of their own ancestors by
prefixing Mac, which they considered equivalent to the Norman Fitz, as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account