The Irish rebellion of 1916 : $b or, the unbroken traditionO'Brien, Nora Connolly
History
The Irish rebellion of 1916 : $b or, the unbroken tradition
O'Brien, Nora Connolly
Ireland -- History -- Easter Rising, 1916
Then it was that, like Daniel O'Connell and other constitutional
leaders, Redmond proved himself of the body and not the soul of
Ireland. He did not follow the example of Parnell, whose follower he
was supposed to be, and use the threat of this large physical force
party to {xv} gain his ends from the English Government. Parnell
used to say to the British House of Commons: "If you do not listen to
me, there is a large band of physical force men, with whom I have no
influence, and upon whom I have no control, and _they_ will compel
you to listen to them." But Redmond, jealous of all parties outside
his own (knowing well that when an Irishman had a rifle in his hands
he no longer felt subservient to, or feared England; and that when
the people of Ireland had the means to demand the freedom of their
country they grew impatient of speech-making and petitioning), grew
fearful for the loss of power of the Irish Parliamentary Party.
He knew also, that, as in the days of O'Connell, Butt, and Parnell,
the people firmly believed that all the talk and show of
constitutionalism was a blind, merely a throwing of dust in the eyes
of the English Government, and to save himself and his Party he must
approve this physical Force party. But not content with approval he
needs must try to capture the Irish Volunteers. This attempt, I
firmly believe, was made upon the advice, or the command of the
British Government. He sent a demand to the Executive Committee
{xvi} that a number of his appointees be received upon the Committee.
This would enable him to know and obstruct all measures made by the
Irish Volunteers and would prevent the loss of power of the
Parliamentary Party.
By the votes of a small majority of the Committee these appointees
were accepted. But the Committee soon found out that it was
impossible to arm and prepare men for a revolution against a
government, while the paid servants of that government were amongst
them. They decided to part company even at the risk of a division in
the ranks. They knew that every man who remained with them could be
depended upon to do his part when the time for the Rising came.
Then England went to war. Shortly before this a Home Rule Bill had
passed two readings in the House of Commons. England saw the
stupidity of appealing to Irishmen to go to fight for the freedom of
small nationalities, while any measure of freedom was denied to their
own. So the Home Rule Bill passed the final reading in the House of
Commons, and was put upon the Statute Book. Then fearful of the
dissatisfaction of the Unionists an amendment was tacked on {xvii}
that prevented its going into effect until after the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account