The Ivory Workers of the Middle AgesCust, Anna Maria Elizabeth
History
The Ivory Workers of the Middle Ages
Cust, Anna Maria Elizabeth
Ivories -- History; Ivories, Medieval
These tablets were so costly that Theodosius decreed in 384 that they
should only be given away by the _Consules Ordinarii_, or the Consuls
admitted on the 1st of January and who named the year, and not by
those who replaced them or by any other officials; but this law was
soon disregarded, and nine years later we read in a letter of the
noble Roman Symmachus that, in honour of his son’s elevation to the
quæstorship he is sending to the very same Emperor a diptych set in
gold.
This series of diptychs spreads over a period of about 150 years, from
the end of the fourth to the middle of the sixth century. The sculpture
steadily decreasing in value, the earliest examples show freedom
of design and good work, but the last were nothing but indifferent
repetitions of the same subjects, in bad proportion and worse relief
till it became possible to produce a figure such as that of Orestes
(Fig. 4). Soon after Orestes the Emperor Justinian abolished this
ancient office, and, really, he must be held justified if all the
consuls could do was to give bloodthirsty shows to the citizens, and
still more corrupt the standard of art by distributing such despicable
types of art among the provincials.
It is noticeable that all the fifth century diptychs, the earliest and
the best, both consular and otherwise are from the West. By the end
of the century there was a complete collapse, following the further
invasions of the Huns and other barbarians, and the Western Empire
flickered out with the suppression, by Odoacer the Goth, of the last
emperor, grotesquely named Romulus Augustulus, a sort of satire on his
unworthy following of such mighty predecessors.
Orestes, Consul at Rome, 530 (Fig. 4), No. 34,[1] is the only Western
Consul of the sixth century whose diptych has been preserved; the style
is so like that of Constantinople, that it gives weight to Graeven’s
theory that the medallions on it represent Amalasuntha, daughter of
Theodoric the Ostro-Goth, who was then ruling in the name of her young
son Athalric, and who carried on that short renaissance of the Arts, so
artificially introduced from Constantinople by her father. The busts
cannot represent the reigning Emperor Justinian and his wife Theodora,
because at that time he was forty-eight years of age, and they never
had a son.
Before passing to the real consular diptychs, it is impossible to leave
unmentioned the splendid tablets of Probianus at Berlin (Fig. 2), No.
50.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account