eodem recidit_, _obligatio ad culpam_, _et obligatio ad pænam_.”—(De Juramenti Obligatione, præl. 1, § 12, ed. Lond. 1696.) What I said at the end of my last letter had reference to an expression of yours with regard to the faith—“our difference of opinion”—which seemed to me objectionable, as being what is called latitudinarian; it was, perhaps, unduly observed upon by me. I remain, my dear Sir, Yours faithfully, HENRY WALLER, Rev. Edw. Hoare. * * * * * Ramsgate, January 9, 1852. My dear Sir, I am much obliged to you for your letter, and I shall have much pleasure in referring to as many of the passages named as I can find in my own library or borrow from my friends, but it cannot be with the view of altering my lecture, as that is already published. The Latin of the Constitution is subjoined in a note, so that if I am wrong I am open to the correction of all Latin scholars. I remain, dear Sir, Very faithfully yours, EDWARD HOARE. H. Waller, Esq. * * * * * Manor Road, Upper Holloway, Jan. 13, 1852. My dear Sir, I have procured your Lecture, and read the statement which led to our correspondence, together with the note which you have subjoined as the result of it. I cannot but feel surprised at the character of that note. There has been such an acknowledgment, on your part, of doubt on the subject, that I think I was justified in expecting some reference to it, and to the grounds of it, and then, either an admission of continued doubt, or, if so it be, a statement of the considerations which removed it. Under all the circumstances I feel that, should I think proper to do so, I shall be justified in giving publicity to the correspondence which has taken place. Very deeply lamenting its most painful issue, I remain, dear Sir, Yours faithfully, HENRY WALLER. Rev. Edward Hoare. * * * * * Hampstead, Jan. 16th, 1852. My dear Sir,