The Jewel House: An Account of the Many Romances Connected with the Royal Regalia: Together with Sir Gilbert Talbot's Account of Colonel Blood's PlotYounghusband, G. J. (George John)
History
The Jewel House: An Account of the Many Romances Connected with the Royal Regalia: Together with Sir Gilbert Talbot's Account of Colonel Blood's Plot
Younghusband, G. J. (George John)
Crown jewels -- Great Britain
Inside the new Jewel House a strong cage was constructed, through the
bars of which by light of dim lanterns the Crown Jewels could be seen at
certain hours by those who had passes, and were prepared to pay a fee
for the same. That the tremors of those who feared danger from fire were
not unfounded eventually proved only too true. In 1843 the Armoury,
which as mentioned was only a few feet from the Jewel House, caught fire
and was burnt to the ground, placing the Crown Jewels in most imminent
peril. That they escaped severe damage, if not destruction, was due to
the great presence of mind, ready resource, and courage of a Sergeant,
who broke into the Jewel House, and aided by yeomen bundled the precious
articles without ceremony out on to the parade ground. Though thus
hastily cast forth, and in spite of the crowd and confusion, nothing was
lost or injured. It would be gratifying to be able to record that the
hero of this adventure received some notable recognition of the service
he had rendered. Truth, however, impels the confession that the deed was
at the time eclipsed by the great tragedy of the burning down of the
ancient Armoury, a building several centuries old with many historic
associations. Later, when this conspicuous service came to light, the
ardour of recompense had grown cold.
[Illustration:THE JEWEL HOUSE IN THE TOWER OF LONDON
_Campbell Gray photo_]
The next, and present, abode of the Crown Jewels became the Wakefield
Tower, one of the lesser towers on the inner ballium wall, adjoining the
Bloody Tower and facing the Traitors’ Gate. The origin of the name has
been a subject of some discussion. For many years, indeed for some
centuries, the Wakefield Tower was held to have been so named because
the prisoners taken at the battle of Wakefield were therein imprisoned.
But further examination shows that this tower was never used as a
prison, nor could it have contained the number of prisoners supposed to
have been incarcerated in it. Moreover, there is some evidence that the
name was given to this tower long before the battle of Wakefield. A more
reliable conclusion is that it was named after William de Wakefield, one
of the King’s Clerks, who was appointed to hold custody of the Exchanges
in the Tower in 1344, and very possibly had his office in part of this
building.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account