Atheism as a philosophic doctrine was relatively rare. Diagoras of
Melos, a contemporary of Socrates, and Theodore of Cyrene,[211] a
contemporary of the first Ptolemy, were said to have held that doctrine,
and the former was known from it as “the Atheist.” However, even in this
case we cannot be quite sure of our ground. Some of the poems of
Diagoras seem to have a distinct, even a strong, religious feeling.
Josephus asserts that Diagoras’ offense in Athenian eyes was scoffing at
the mysteries.[212] If that is true, he received his sobriquet less from
atheism, as we understand it, than from the same facts that brought
Protagoras, Anaxagoras, and Socrates himself within the ban of the
Athenian police. That is, he was charged rather with contempt of the
actually constituted deities of the Athenian state than with a general
negation of a divinity. The term itself, ἄθεος, is not
necessarily negative. In fact, Greek had very few purely negative ideas.
In Plato’s Euthyphro[213] the only alternatives that are admitted are
θεοφιλές and θεομισές, _i.e._ what the gods
hate and what the gods love. So the various Greek adjectives compounded
with “α privative,” ανωφελής, “useless,”
ἄβουλος, “thoughtless,” are really used in a positive sense
contrary to that of the positive adjective. So ανωφελής is
rather “harmful” than merely “useless”; ἄβουλος is
“ill-advised”; etc. The word ἄθεος would, by that analogy,
rather denote one that opposed certain gods than one who denied them. A
man might be ἄθεος in one community and not in another.
Indeed his “atheism” might be an especial devotion to a divine principle
which was not that recognized by the state.
In ordinary literary usage ἄθεος is denuded even of this
significance. It means little more than “wicked.” It is used so by
Pindar, by Sophocles, and in general by the orators. Often it runs in
pairs with other adjectives of the same character. Xenophon calls
Tissaphernes (An. II. v. 29) ἀθεότατος καὶ πανουργότατος,
“most godless and wicked,” in which the superlative is especially
noteworthy. As a matter of fact it is often used of a man whom the gods
would have none of, rather than one who rejects the gods. Ἄθεος,
ἄφιλος ὀλοίμαν, cries the chorus in Oedipus Rex, “May I die
abandoned by gods and men.”[214]
When it is first used of the Jews by Molo, it is as part of just such a
group; ἄθεοι καὶ μισάνθρωποι, he calls the Jews, “hateful
to gods and men,” and other rhetoricians follow suit. As a term of
abuse, ἄθεος was as good as any other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account