But migration of all or some of the worshipers of a given deity was not
the only way by which the god himself moved from place to place. Exotic
rituals, as soon as men became acquainted with them, had attractions of
their own, especially if they contained features that made a direct
sensational appeal. The medium of transference may have been the
constantly increasing commerce, which brought strangers into every city
at various times. In all Greek communities there was a large number of
“disinherited”—metics, emancipated slaves, suffrageless plebs—to whom
the established gods seemed cold and aloof, or who had only a limited
share in the performance of the established ritual. These men perhaps
were the first to welcome newer rituals, which it was safer to introduce
when they were directed to newer gods.[24] They were assisted in doing
this by the long-noted tolerance Greeks exhibited toward other religious
observances, a tolerance which Christian Europe has taught us to
consider strange and exceptional.
That tolerance was not altogether an inference from polytheism itself.
Polytheism, to be sure, takes for granted the existence of other gods in
other localities, but it does not follow that it permits the entrance of
one god into the jurisdiction of another. And it was not universal.
Among communities inhospitable in other respects it did not prevail. But
it was the general rule, because the conception of ἀσέβεια,
of “impiety,”[25] was largely the same everywhere. Impiety was such
conduct as prevented or corrupted the established forms of divine
communication. The introduction of new deities was an indictable offense
at Athens only so far as it displaced the old ones. Where no such danger
was apprehended, no charge would lie. The traditions that describe the
bitter opposition which the introduction of Dionysus encountered in many
places, are too uniform to be discredited.[26] But the opposition was
directed to the grave social derangements that doubtless attended the
adoption by many of an enthusiastic ritual. The opposition cannot have
been general nor of long duration, since the worship of Dionysus spread
with extraordinary rapidity, and covered the whole Greek world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account