At the fall of the temple the voluntary tax of the shekel or didrachm,
which had formerly been paid to the temple at Jerusalem, and which was a
vital factor in the very first instances of conflict between the Jews
and the Roman authorities (comp. above, p. 226), was converted into an
official tax for the support of the central sanctuary of the Roman state
on the Capitoline Hill. Whether Roman citizens who were Jews paid it,
does not appear. All others however did. The bureau that enforced it was
known as the _fiscus Iudaicus_, the word _fiscus_ indicating here, as
always, that the sums so collected were considered as belonging to the
treasury of the reigning prince during the time of his reign, rather
than to the public treasury.
It does not seem that this tax, except for its destination, was believed
by the Jews to be an act of notable oppression, nor was its enforcement
more inquisitorial than that of other taxes; but it became an especial
weapon of blackmail in Rome and in all Italy, and this blackmail grew
into dimensions so formidable that action had to be taken to suppress
it.
In Rome, we may remember, there was no officer at all resembling our
public prosecutor or district-attorney. The prosecution of criminals was
an individual task, whether of the person aggrieved or of a citizen
acting from patriotic motives. Indeed it had at one time been considered
a duty of the highest insistence, and innumerable Romans had won their
first distinction in this way. The delators of the early empire were in
theory no different, though the reward of their activity was not the
glory or popularity achieved, but the substantial one of a lump sum, or
a share in the fine imposed, a practice still in vogue in our own
jurisdictions. Plainly, under such circumstances, there were temptations
to a form of blackmail which the Greeks knew as συκοφαντία,
and the Romans as _calumnia_; _i.e._ the bringing of suits known to be
unjustified, or with reckless disregard of their justification, for the
purpose of sharing in some reward for doing this quasi-public service.
Private prosecutors at Roman law were required to swear that they were
not proceeding _calumniae causa_, “with blackmailing intent.”[361]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account