Footnote 147:
Il. iii. 243-244; v. 638-651; xviii. 117-119.
Footnote 148:
Cf. the translation of Menelaus, ch. I, notes 28, 29.
Footnote 149:
Hymn in Dem. 480-482.
Footnote 150:
Ben Sira knows of no life after death except Sheol. Perhaps it is
better to say that he refuses to acknowledge any. His repeated
affirmations have the air of consciously repudiating a doctrine
advanced by others. The author of Wisdom (iii. 4) is sure of an
immortality of the elect. It is in the apocryphal literature
generally, in Enoch, the Testaments of the Patriarchs—most of them
written in the first century B.C.E.—that the scattered and
contradictory references to a future life are to be found.
Footnote 151:
Josephus, Wars, II. viii. 14. His words are (οἱ
Σαδδουκαῖοι) ψυχῆς τε τὴν διαμονὴν καὶ τὰς καθ’ Ἄδου
τιμωρίας καὶ τιμὰς ἀναιροῦσι. The passages in Josephus are our
only contemporary authority for the sects and their differences; and
Josephus was a Pharisee. The word αναιροῦσι would in this
context naturally have the meaning “deny,” but it might also simply
indicate that the Sadducean belief on the subject was, in his opinion,
so vague or so qualified as to render their whole transcendental
scheme ineffectual. It is, however, more natural to give the word its
dialectic sense (Cf. Plato, Rep. 533 c).
Footnote 152:
Joseph. Ant. XIII. x. 10. Kid. 43 a.
Footnote 153:
The vision of a Messianic age in Isaiah ii. 4, and Micah iv. 1,
expressly includes the gentiles. This is the more important as it is
highly likely that both Micah and Isaiah are here quoting an ancient
and widely-accepted prophecy.
Footnote 154:
There is no direct evidence about the extent of proselytizing in
pre-Maccabean times. But there are two forms of proselytizing which
always seemed natural and even inevitable to a man of ancient times.
The slave, and the stranger actually resident under the roof of a head
of a household, were, however foreign in blood, practically members of
that household, and it was a small step when they were brought
formally into it by appropriate ceremonies. So the first Biblical
reference to circumcision especially notes that not merely Abraham but
all his household, the slaves born there and those bought of
strangers, were circumcised (Gen. xvii. 23, 27).
The גר, μέτοικος, the sojourning stranger,
is expressly held to the observance of the religious prohibitions. Ex.
xii. 43; Lev. xvii. 12. And the relative frequency with which such a
stranger became a full proselyte is indicated by Ex. xii. 48, and Num.
ix. 14. It is true that the נכר or “stranger in blood” is
treated with extreme rigor by Nehemiah, xiii. 30, but it is this same
נכר who is referred to as a proselyte in Deutero-Isaiah
(Is. lvi. 3, 6).
Footnote 155:
Ab. R. Nat. ii. 1.
Footnote 156:
Josephus, Ant. XV. viii.
Footnote 157:
Josephus, Wars IV. iv.; VII. viii.
Footnote 158:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account