The particular section later occupied by the Jews had itself been the
scene of a racial babel. The Israelites were, by their tradition,
expressly commanded to dispossess Hittite, Girgashite, Canaanite,
Amorite, Perizzite, Hivite, and Jebusite.[71] The recurrence of this
enumeration indicates an historical basis for the tradition. It is very
likely that nations so named were actually subdued by the invading
Hebrews. The fact that the tribes dispossessed are seven in number makes
caution necessary in accepting the statement. Perhaps some of these
“nations” are different names for the same group. Some of them, _e.g._
Hittite or Amorite, may be vague descriptive terms, like Syrian or even
Hebrew.
Then there were the Phoenicians, representing perhaps the first Semitic
invasion of this territory. Below them, the Philistines, “from
Caphthor,” who are very plausibly identified with Cretans or “Minoans,”
the Keftiu of the Egyptians.[72] During Mesopotamian and Egyptian
sovereignty, Mesopotamian and Egyptian infiltration may be safely
assumed. The desert never ceased to contribute its share of tribes.
Permanent results of such nomad invasions were the settlement of the
various Hebrew tribes—Moab and Edom in the southeast and Israel on both
sides of the Jordan.
If the analogy of other times and places is to be followed, no one of
these groups was ever completely and literally exterminated. Jewish
tradition knows of an attempted extermination—that of the
Amalekites—only as a very exceptional thing. The resultant
nationalities, which in Greek times occupied Palestine, were likely
enough to have been of somewhat mixed origin. When the Greeks came to
know them well, however, the Jews had long been a well-defined group,
frowning upon intermarriage, although it is not likely that the
prohibition of connubium had its source in any importance attached to
racial purity, or that all Jews everywhere were equally strict in
enforcing it.[73]
As has been suggested, the first contact was probably military. Since
Jews served in the Persian armies as far south as Elephantine, they
probably were equally present in the battalions of Datis and of
Mardonius.[74] Another early contact was in the slave-mart, no doubt
both as buyers and the bought. Enterprising Tyrian traders had made
themselves comfortable in Jerusalem before Nehemiah (Neh. xiii. 6), and
human commodities formed the chief merchandise of most commerce. Before
him, perhaps before the Exile, Joel reproaches the Phoenicians with the
words, “The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye
sold unto the Grecians.”[75] “Syrus” had become a common slave-name in
Greece in the fifth century, and Syrus might include anything.[76]
All these scattered and uncertain hints do not tend to present a very
clear picture. However, the time was rapidly coming when Greek contact
with “Syria” was to be vastly more intimate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account