First we have a number of Greek and Latin writers who incidentally or
specially referred to the Jews. However, as is the case with many other
matters of prime importance, the writings of most of these authors have
not come down to us completely, but in fragments. That is to say, we
have only the brief citations made of them by much later writers, or
contained in very late compilations, such as lexicons, commonplace
books, or manuals for instruction. Modern scholars have found it
imperatively necessary to collect these fragments, so that they may be
compared and studied more readily. In this way the fragments of lost
books on history, grammar, music, of lost poems and plays, have been
collected at various times. Similarly the fragments concerning the Jews
have been collected, and gathered into a single book by M. Théodore
Reinach, under the title of _Textes d’ auteurs grecs et latins relatifs
au judaisme_. Here the Greek and Latin texts and the French translation
of them are arranged in parallel columns, and furnished with explanatory
footnotes. M. Reinach’s great distinction as a classical scholar enables
him to speak with authority upon many of the controverted questions that
these texts contain. Often his judgment as to what certain passages mean
may be unquestioningly accepted, and at all times one disagrees with him
with diffidence.
Secondly, we have the Jewish literature of the period; but that
literature was produced under such various conditions and with such
diverse purposes that a further classification is necessary.
Most important for our purposes is that part of Jewish literature which
was a direct outcome of the contact we are setting forth—the apologetic
writings of the Jews, or those books written in Greek, only rarely in
Latin, in which Jewish customs and history are explained or defended for
non-Jewish readers. Most of these books likewise have been lost, and
have left only inconsiderable fragments, but in the case of two writers
we have very extensive remains. One of these men is the Alexandrian Jew
Philo, a contemporary of the first Roman emperors. The other was the
Palestinian Jew Joseph, who played an important, if ignoble, part in the
rebellion of 68 C.E.
An estimate of the character of Philo and Josephus—to give the latter
the name by which alone he is remembered—or of the value of their works,
is out of place here. Philo’s extant writings are chiefly concerned with
philosophic exposition, and are only indirectly of documentary value.
However, he also wrote a “Defense” of his people, of which large
portions have survived, notably the _In Flaccum_, a bitter invective
against the prefect of Egypt under Tiberius, and the _Legatio ad Gaium_,
a plea in behalf of the Alexandrian Jews made to the emperor Caligula by
an embassy of which Philo was himself a member.[2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account