The Journal-Lancet, Vol. XXXV, No. 5, March 1, 1915: The Journal of the Minnesota State Medical Association and Official Organ of the North Dakota and South Dakota State Medical AssociationsVarious
Science
The Journal-Lancet, Vol. XXXV, No. 5, March 1, 1915: The Journal of the Minnesota State Medical Association and Official Organ of the North Dakota and South Dakota State Medical Associations
Various
Medicine -- Periodicals
It has taken considerable effort on the part of nurses to convince
the people, and to convince some doctors, that they are any more than
machines. Because we ask for three hours rest out of the twenty-four,
and because we asked for a fixed rate for service, Dr. Head says that
our loyalty to high ideals is diminishing. Unfortunately, in the
nursing profession, as in all other professions, there are some who
are incapable and unconscientious; and, if Dr. Head had the experience
of having a nurse leave a patient, unattended, at a critical time, she
probably was one of the few incapables, or was so overtired from loss
of sleep that it was necessary for her to have rest. When Dr. Head says
that a nurse should waive her rest hours for days or a week at a time,
if necessary, I think he is making a mistake. A nurse cannot do her
duty by a patient if she does not have proper rest. It is unfair to
both the patient and the nurse. Dr. Head may say that most patients are
not in need of constant attention for more than a few days or a week,
and that a nurse can stand it for that length of time without rest
hours. This is true; but we have to consider that the next case may be
just as critical, and so the nurse must reserve some strength for the
cases to follow. And more often than not, the nurse is obliged to take
cases with very little or no rest between them.
In the second place, Dr. Head thinks that the nurses ought to have a
varying scale of charges for service. The doctors do it; why shouldn’t
the nurses? Dr. Head does not seem to consider the fact that the nurse
has one patient, while the doctor has many. Suppose a nurse takes care
of a poor patient for five or ten dollars a week, where is the rich
patient who is willing to pay forty or fifty dollars a week to make up
the loss? The nurses have found that twenty-five dollars a week is the
price that is necessary for them to live on in order to keep themselves
clothed, pay for their laundry (no small item), and carry them over the
few weeks of rest or over the dull season. The average life of a nurse,
as a nurse, is, I believe, not more than ten years. In that length of
time, at the wages she gets, she is not able to lay away a great amount
for a rainy day, which usually comes all too soon.
We have a number of good hospitals in Minneapolis where people
in moderate circumstances can be very comfortably cared for at a
considerably less expense than employing a nurse in their homes. The
poor in our city, I think, are fairly well taken care of in the city
hospitals and by the visiting nurses, who are paid for such work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account