The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy 1919 (New Series, No. 58)Pennsylvania Prison Society
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy 1919 (New Series, No. 58)
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
The bill submitted to carry this recommendation into effect omits the
counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny from its operation. Allegheny
County already has a prison farm which in many ways may be considered
a model of its kind. Philadelphia has a farm in connection with the
House of Correction which furnishes employment to many prisoners and
supplies much produce for the institution. We recommend that at some
early date the City of Philadelphia may, by the purchase of more land,
extend the advantages of a penal farm to its convict prison and in
some way combine under one management the entire penal system of the
municipality.
The fee system, whereby the sheriff or warden receives a stipulated
sum each day for the board of prisoners, is so liable to abuse that
we submit a proposition to abolish the practice in all our prisons.
Whenever the profits from boarding the prisoners is a part of the
remuneration of the officer in charge, the tendency is doubtless to
exploit the prisoners, or to reduce to a minimum the supply of food, in
order to derive the greater profit.
In 1915 a comprehensive study of the cost of boarding the prisoners in
the largest 25 counties of the Commonwealth indicated that the average
daily cost of food per prisoner in the 15 prisons where the food was
purchased on the contract system was 12 cents, and in the 10 counties
where the fee system was in vogue 33.7 cents, the difference in favor
of the contract system being 21.7 cents per day for each prisoner.
We estimate that in these 10 counties alone the saving to the taxpayers
by the adoption of the contract system will be at least $50,000
annually. The economy of the proposition is evident, making due
allowance for providing in some counties additional compensation for
the official in charge of the prison. In all cases where a change has
been made from the fee system to the contract system, the food has
improved in character, thus tending to the betterment of the health and
morale of the inmates.
Moved by these considerations, the General Assembly in 1909 provided
that in all counties having a population of 150,000 or more, the food
for the prisoners must be purchased by contract. We are now proposing
to extend this principle to all the counties of the Commonwealth, with
the understanding that no such change is to take place during the
incumbency of the officials who are at the present time in charge of
the prisons.
VI.
PROBATION AND PAROLE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account