The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
In many respects these Parliamentary Reports may be regarded as of more
consequence to Boards of Prison Inspectors, than to the “Society for
Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons,” as they set forth the
economy of the institutions, the discipline, the means of comfort, and
the character of employment, as well as the results of all these, and
the exact cost; and thus they may become useful as indicative of what
Boards of Inspectors should carefully shun or promptly adopt, with such
modifications and adaptations as difference of circumstances renders
necessary.
But, in Great Britain and Ireland, much of the labor assumed by the
Philadelphia “Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons,”
is undertaken by the Government; and the closeness of the investigation
of their affairs, and the fulness of the Reports, are consequent upon
the interest which philanthropic individuals have awakened throughout
the country, and the action which has been secured by both Houses of
Parliament. The great volume of Reports of the action of “a committee of
the House of Lords” is of deep interest, even in this country, as
showing not merely the condition of certain great prisons, but as
illustrating, especially, the effect of different systems of treatment
and labor. The elevated rank of the persons who composed the commission
of inquiry, shows the importance which the House of Lords attached to
the subject; and the constancy of attendance, and the searching
character of questions put to those under examination, show the fidelity
of the distinguished noblemen to the interests submitted to their
care.[2]
Footnote 2:
The select committee consisted of the Duke of Marlborough, Marquis of
Salisbury, Lord Steward, Earl of Carnarvon, (who was elected Lord
President,) Earl of Malmsebury, Earl of Romney, Earl Cathcart, Earl of
Ducie, Earl of Dudley, Viscount Eversley, Lord Wodehouse, Lord
Lyvedon, Duke of Richmond, Lord Wensleydale.
Of the five hundred and twelve folio pages of these Reports, there is
not one that is without interest to every active member of this Society.
There are 5,337 questions propounded by the various members of the
commission, and answers rendered by those who have been in the
administration of the prisons, or who had been exercising the duties of
visitors, inspectors, physicians, &c., of the several prisons; and those
answers present a most minute exhibit of the exact state of the prisons,
and all that relates to their administration.
In some of the prisons, we find that there is a physician employed at
_seventy-five_ dollars a year, and that he visits twice a week.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account