The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 46, January 1907)Pennsylvania Prison Society
Religion
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 46, January 1907)
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
“I am not losing sight of the purpose of imprisonment both to stamp
crime as crime and to protect society from the criminal. I am only
advocating the thought of reform for which this Association stands. If
a man is a murderer condemned to die, then there is the overwhelming
duty and responsibility of bringing him to repentance, that he may die
forgiven. If he is serving a sentence indeterminate or for a fixed
time, then surely the influence and effort of prison discipline must
be not to harden him into sullen hatred of law and of all that the
law stands for, not in a harbored purpose to revenge himself in some
way, when once he is free, upon the society which has condemned him;
but to waken in him such a sense of shame as shall force him back
to the possibility of self-respect, and bring him to that point of
realized wrong by means of which he shall ‘come to himself.’ That is
the Master’s own description of the prodigal son. Far as he had strayed
from his father’s house, he had strayed farther from his real self, the
self of his innocent childhood, the self of his home and surroundings,
the self of his true nature, and it was when the true man wakened in
him that, coming first to himself, he came next to his father’s house.
“In this recognition of the criminal’s sin there must be enforced
the discipline of penalty, and of penalty as punishment, but it must
be carefully dealt with, so as in no sense to convey the thought of
retribution or of vindictive retaliation. The strides of progress which
have been made in the last century and a half under the methods of such
real reformers as Howard and Wines (whom, as a boy, I remember very
well), and Elizabeth Fry and Dorothy Dix, have, among other things, set
the stamp of this idea in the fact that capital punishment, which used
to be inflicted for many crimes, is reserved to the one for which it
was divinely ordered, and from which, I trust, it will never be taken
away, namely, the sin of shedding another’s blood. Meanwhile, more and
more, in the selection of wardens, in the appointment of chaplains,
in the abolition of the fearful cruelties of physical torture, in the
decent sanitation of prisons, we have grown more and more to realize
that the condemned criminal is to be treated as a man who needs
protection, systematic discipline, the training of the prison, to
protect him from himself, to put into him the purpose and set before
him the possibility of a better life, rather than to humiliate and
crush him into desperation and despair. It is quite true that no amount
of legislation and no method of enforcing laws can make a man moral,
but it is also true that the law which defines and punishes sin deters
men from the commission of crime, and when the criminal is condemned
and sentenced and his punishment begins, only the power of religion can
reach him to convince him of his sin, to convert him from his habits,
to reach the motives of his life, to change the tendency of his will,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account