The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 47 and 48, January 1909)Pennsylvania Prison Society
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 47 and 48, January 1909)
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
“The next type calling for special discipline is the _outrageous
fellow_. I have asked myself what reason there is in psychology, in
humanity or in common sense for making a prison a silent tomb. How can
we hope to socialize young men by denying them communication by speech?
If a man refuses to talk or laugh, incipient insanity is at once
suspected. With these thoughts in mind, I thought I would do away with
the rule requiring silence in the dining room. Hoary-headed tradition
forbade it; prison administrators in whose wisdom I have the greatest
confidence questioned it; but I was impelled to try it. All went well
until one day the ‘outrageous fellow’ referred to was brought to court
charged with quarreling with his neighbor at table, hurling a large
porcelain bowl of tea into his opponent’s face, slightly burning him and
cutting an ugly gash in his head. The most serious offense, however, was
creating a condition in a crowded dining room favorable to riot. It was
the opinion of our officers that he should be severely punished, their
idea of punishment including the infliction of bodily pain. I agreed
that he deserved whipping, but reminded the officers that this world was
not entirely established on the basis of desert; that the best of us had
little claim to heaven on that basis. We did not whip him, not because
he did not deserve it, but because we owed it to him and to the
institution to do that thing that would most positively quicken the
moral sense and create a wholesome public sentiment. Calling him up, I
told him that he had put me to shame; that he had justified all my
critics who said that I would get into trouble by allowing the boys to
talk at the table; that he was the only one out of a thousand that
failed to appreciate what had been done for him. ‘Now,’ I said to him,
‘$1’ This method, I believe, had the approval of practically every
inmate of the institution. The boy himself said that he would rather be
whipped, as he felt that he had been whipped every time he came into the
dining room and turned his back to the other inmates; they would all
feel that he was unfit to be with them. After three weeks he made full
amends and was allowed to join his fellows, and never gave trouble
afterwards.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account