The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 50) November 1911Pennsylvania Prison Society
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 50) November 1911
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
The thirty-year clause of the act of 1909 was designed to protect
society against the professional criminal. It is another absurdity
of our criminal procedure that we release such periodically to renew
their depredations on society. A dangerously insane person we put away
until he is cured; and if he is never cured he is never released. We
guard society against the contagion of certain virulent diseases. But
when the habitual criminal has every now and then squared himself with
the State by serving a term in the penitentiary, we again give him
his freedom, though he may have hatched out another plot even before
he leaves his place of confinement. Some other States have grown
wiser. New York and Indiana sentence the habitual criminal for life on
a third or fourth conviction; Connecticut to thirty years on a third
conviction; but in Pennsylvania a thirty-year sentence, with a minimum
not exceeding seven years and a half, seems to have been considered too
drastic. Better let society suffer than the criminal!
In amending the law of 1909, which, under its intelligent
administration for two years was yielding most happy results,
Pennsylvania has clearly been compelled to take a backward step.
There was no public demand for a change; those charged with the
administration of the law did not desire a change, but opposed it; and
there is ample ground for the belief that the change was inspired by
reasons of a purely private and personal character.
Nor is the last Legislature to be commended for what it failed to do.
In his report of November 10, 1909, Mr. Bromley Wharton, General Agent
and Secretary of the Board of Public Charities, called attention to the
needs of the county jails in these words: “This is a matter which has
received serious attention at the hands of your Board. The prevailing
system of government of the county jails is, in many respects,
unsatisfactory. In most of the counties the jails are in charge of
the sheriff, who, as a rule, knows little or nothing of hygiene or
sanitation. Few jails have yards for exercise, or workshops, which
results in the prisoners loafing in the corridors, smoking and playing
cards. The filthy and unsanitary condition of some of the jails causes
the long-term prisoners to welcome their transfer to the penitentiary.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account