The journal of prison discipline and philanthropy (New series, No. 57), March, 1918 — John Shaqi
The journal of prison discipline and philanthropy (New series, No. 57), March, 1918Pennsylvania Prison Society
History
The journal of prison discipline and philanthropy (New series, No. 57), March, 1918
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
Mr. Edward Taenzer, Inspector of Berks County, informed the meeting
that this season they had employed prisoners on their County Farm, and
that the experiment had been a decided success from every point of
view. Two years ago an effort had been made to employ the prisoners
on this land, and this proposition had been heartily approved by
the Inspectors, the County Commissioners, the Directors of the Poor
and the local press. The Solicitors of the Boards, however, held
that such action was illegal, admitting that work on roads was the
only employment allowed to prisoners except behind the bars. Since
the beginning of the great war Mr. Taenzer and others renewed their
efforts to find employment for the prisoners on farms, meeting with
formidable opposition, but since the legal bar was removed by recent
legislation the prisoners have been hard at work, giving satisfaction
to all concerned. The selected men are taken by conveyance to the Farm
and work for eight hours daily. They have produced from four to five
hundred bushels of potatoes and a like proportion of other vegetables.
Just now they are working on the drainage project. The Poor Directors
provide the midday meal, and it is expected that hereafter they may
provide for the necessary supervision. The men receive no pay for their
labor, but esteem it a great privilege thus to be employed.
Secretary Votaw stated that the consensus of opinion was evidently
favorable to the employment of county prisoners on farms as far as
possible. He invited Agent McGarry, of the State Board of Charities, to
comment on the attitude of this Board on this subject. Mr. McGarry said
that the Board had for many years advocated such employment and that
the emergency created by the war had made such legislation possible.
The Acting Chairman then called the attention of the conference to Act.
No. 399, which received the approval of the Governor on the 20th of
July, 1917. The law had practically been unheralded, but its execution
would revolutionize conditions in all the counties of the State.
The Act provides for the division of the State into nine Districts,
containing from five to ten counties, in each of which Districts there
shall be established an institution to which all convicts, sentenced
to a term of ten days or more, may be sent. It seemed to be formulated
with a view to the general betterment of the prisoners confined in the
county jails. The fact that there was no clause making it compulsory to
send prisoners to such institution was regarded as a weak feature.
General discussion followed. There were many present who had not seen
the law, or even heard thereof. There was a general opinion that this
law should be carefully considered before the conference should come to
a settled conclusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account