The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
While the large selection of translations has met with approval from
very high sources, yet there has been some disappointment expressed at
the lack of original articles. Considerably more than half of the
articles have been original entirely, while all the translations are
new. The complaint, however, relates more especially to what its authors
are pleased to call the Un-American character of the contents of the
Journal. Here the editor feels like pleading ignorance as an excuse.—In
what books is one to find the true “American” type of Speculative
Philosophy? Certain very honorable exceptions occur to every one, but
they are not American in a popular sense. We, as a people, buy immense
editions of John Stuart Mill, Herbert Spencer, Comte, Hamilton, Cousin,
and others; one can trace the appropriation and digestion of their
thoughts in all the leading articles of our Reviews, Magazines and books
of a thoughtful character. If this is American philosophy, the editor
thinks that it may be very much elevated by absorbing and digesting more
refined aliment. It is said that of Herbert Spencer’s works nearly
twenty thousand have been sold in this country, while in England
scarcely the first edition has been bought. This is encouraging for the
American thinker: what lofty spiritual culture may not become broadly
and firmly rooted here where thoughtful minds are so numerous? Let this
spirit of inquiry once extend to thinkers like Plato and Aristotle,
Schelling and Hegel—let these be digested and organically reproduced—and
what a phalanx of American thinkers we may have to boast of! For after
all it is not “American _thought_” so much as American _thinkers_ that
we want. To _think_, in the highest sense, is to transcend all _natural
limits_—such, for example, as national peculiarities, defects in
culture, distinctions in Race, habits, and modes of living—to be
_universal_, so that one can dissolve away the external hull and seize
the substance itself. The peculiarities stand in the way;—were it not
for these, we should find in Greek or German Philosophy just the forms
we ourselves need. Our province as _Americans_ is to rise to purer forms
than have hitherto been attained, and thus speak a “solvent word” of
more potency than those already uttered. If this be the goal we aim at,
it is evident that we can find no other means so well adapted to rid us
of our own idiosyncracies as the study of the greatest thinkers of all
ages and all times. May this Journal aid such a consummation!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account