The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
I. Certain attributes are found to belong to an object, and are not
affected by a certain process. (For example, divisibility as a process
in space does not affect the continuity of space, which makes that
process possible. Or again, the process of limiting space does not
interfere with its continuity, for space will not permit any limit
except space itself.)
II. When the untutored reflection endeavors to apprehend a relation of
this nature, it seizes one side of the dualism and is hurled to the
other. (It bisects space, and then finds itself before two objects
identical in nature with the first; it has effected nothing; it repeats
the process, and, by and by getting exhausted, wonders whether it could
meet a different result if its powers of endurance were greater. Or else
suspecting the true case, says; “no other result would happen if I went
on forever.”)
III. Pure thought, however, grasps this process as a totality, and sees
that it only arises through a self-relation. The “progress” is nothing
but a return to itself, the same monotonous round. It would be a similar
attempt to seek the end of a circle by travelling round it, and one
might make the profound remark: “If my powers were equal to the task, I
should doubtless come to the end.” This difficulty vanishes as soon as
the experience is made that the line returns into itself. “It is the
same thing whether said once or repeated forever,” says Simplicius,
treating of this paradox.
The “Infinite Progress” is the most stubborn fortress of Scepticism. By
it our negative writers establish the impotency of Reason for various
ulterior purposes. Some wish to use it as a lubricating fluid upon
certain religious dogmas that cannot otherwise be swallowed. Others wish
to save themselves the trouble of thinking out the solutions to the
Problem of Life. But the Sphinx devours him who does not faithfully
grapple with, and solve her enigmas.
Mephistopheles (a good authority on this subject) says of Faust, whom he
finds grumbling at the littleness of man’s mind:
“Verachte nur Vernunft und Wissenchaft,
Des Menschen allerhöchste Kraft!
Und hätt’er sich auch nicht dem Teufel übergeben,
Er müsste doch zu Grunde gehen.”
Only prove that there is a large field of the unknowable and one has at
once the _vade mecum_ for stupidity. Crude reflection can pour in its
distinctions into a subject, and save itself from the consequences by
pronouncing the basis incomprehensible. It also removes _all_
possibility of Theology, or of the Piety of the Intellect, and leaves a
very narrow margin for religious sentiment, or the Piety of the Heart.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account