The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
52. And hence it is that actions and passions in creatures are mutual;
for God, comparing two simple substances, finds reasons in each which
oblige him to accommodate the one to the other. Consequently that which
is active in one view, is passive in another—active so far as what we
clearly discern in it serves to account for that which takes place in
another, and passive so far as the reason of that which passes in it is
found in that which is clearly discerned in another.
53. Now, as in the ideas of God there is an infinity of possible worlds,
and as only one can exist, there must be a sufficient reason for the
choice of God, which determines him to one rather than another.
54. And this reason can be no other than fitness, derived from the
different degrees of perfection which these worlds contain, each
possible world having a claim to exist according to the measure of
perfection which it enfolds.
55. And this is the cause of the existence of that Best, which the
wisdom of God discerns, which his goodness chooses, and his power
effects.
56. And this connection, or this accommodation of all created things to
each, and of each to all, implies in each simple substance relations
which express all the rest. Each, accordingly, is a living and perpetual
mirror of the universe.
57. And as the same city viewed from different sides appears quite
different, and is perspectively multiplied, so, in the infinite
multitude of simple substances, there are given, as it were, so many
different worlds which yet are only the perspectives of a single one,
according to the different points of view of each Monad.
58. And this is the way to obtain the greatest possible variety with the
greatest possible order—that is to say, the way to obtain the greatest
possible perfection.
59. Thus this hypothesis (which I may venture to pronounce demonstrated)
is the only one which properly exhibits the greatness of God. And this
Mr. Boyle acknowledges, when in his dictionary (Art. Rorarius) he
objects to it. He is even disposed to think that I attribute too much to
God, that I ascribe to him impossibilities; but he can allege no reason
for the impossibility of this universal harmony, by which each substance
expresses exactly the perfections of all the rest through its relations
with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account