The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867 — John Shaqi
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
IV. What is the _character_ of this independent whole, this _negative
unity_? “Character” means determination, and we are prepared to say that
its determination cannot be through another, for then it would be a
dependent, and we should be referred again to the whole, including it.
Its determination by which the multiplicity of elements arises is hence
its own self-determination. Thus all finitude and dependence presupposes
as its condition, self-determination.
V. Self-determination more closely examined exhibits some remarkable
results, (which will throw light on the discussion of “Essence and
Phenomena” above):
(1.) It is “_causa sui_;” active and passive; existing dually as
determining and determined; this self-diremption produces a distinction
in itself which is again cancelled.
(2.) As determiner (or active, or cause), it is the pure universal—the
_possibility of any_ determinations. But as _determined_ (passive or
effect) it is the special, the particular, the one-sided reality that
enters into change.
(3.) But it is “negative unity” of these two sides, and hence an
individual. The pure universal whose negative relation to itself as
determiner makes the particular, completes itself to individuality
through this act.
(_a._) Since its pure universality is the substrate of its
determination, and at the same time a self-related activity (or
negativity), it at once becomes its own object.
(_b._) Its activity (limiting or determining)—a pure negativity—turned
to itself as object, dissolves the particular in the universal, and thus
continually realizes its subjectivity.
(_c._) Hence these two sides of the negative unity are more properly
subject and object, and since they are identical (_causa sui_) we may
name the result “self-consciousness.”
The absolute truth of all truths, then, is that self-consciousness is
the form of the Total. God is a Person, or rather _the_ Person. Through
His self-consciousness (thought of Himself) he makes Himself an object
to Himself (Nature), and in the same act cancels it again into His own
image (finite spirit), and thus comprehends Himself in this
self-revelation.
Two remarks must be made here: (1.) This is not “Pantheism;” for it
results that God is a Person; and secondly Nature is a self-cancelling
side in the process; thirdly, the so-called “finite spirit,” or man, is
immortal, since otherwise he would not be the last link of the chain;
but such he is, because he can develop out of his sensuous life to pure
thought, unconditioned by time and space, and hence he can surpass any
_fixed_ “higher intelligence,” no matter how high created.
(2.) It is the result that all profound thinkers have arrived at.
Aristotle (Metaphysics XI. 6 & 7) carries this whole question of motion
back to its presupposition in a mode of treatment, “_sub quadam specie
æternitatis_.” He concludes thus: “The thinking, however, of that which
is purely for itself, is a thinking of that which is most excellent in
and for itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account