The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
The subject should be intelligible and interesting to the public to
which it is addressed. But this end the poet or the artist will attain
only so far as, by his general spirit, his work responds to some one of
the essential ideas of the human spirit and to the general interests of
humanity. The particularities of an epoch are not of true and enduring
interest to us.
If, then, the subject is borrowed from remote epochs of history, or from
some far-off tradition, it is necessary that, by our general culture, we
should be familiarized with it. It is thus only that we can sympathize
with an epoch and with manners that are no more. Hence the two essential
conditions; that the subject present the general human character, then
that it be in relation with our ideas.
Art is not designed for a small number of scholars and men of science;
it is addressed to the entire nation. Its works should be comprehended
and relished of themselves, and not after a course of difficult
research. Thus national subjects are the most favorable. All great poems
are national poems. The Bible histories have for us a particular charm,
because we are familiar with them from our infancy. Nevertheless, in the
measure that relations are multiplied between peoples, art can borrow
its subjects from all latitudes and from all epochs. It should, indeed,
as to the principal features, preserve, to the traditions, events, and
personages, to manners and institutions, their historic or traditional
character; but the duty of the artist, above all, is to place the idea
which constitutes its content in harmony with the spirit of his own age,
and the peculiar genius of his nation.
In this necessity lies the reason and excuse for what is called
anachronism in art. When the anachronism bears only upon external
circumstances it is unimportant. It becomes a matter of more moment if
we attribute to the characters, the ideas, and sentiments of another
epoch. Respect must be paid to historic truth, but regard must also be
had to the manners and intellectual culture of one’s own time. The
heroes of Homer themselves are more than were the real personages of the
epoch which he presents; and the characters of Sophocles are brought
still nearer to us. To violate thus the rules of historic reality, is a
necessary anachronism in art. Finally, another form of anachronism,
which the utmost moderation and genius can alone make pardonable, is
that which transfers the religious or moral ideas of a more advanced
civilization to an anterior epoch; when one attributes, for example, to
the ancients the ideas of the moderns. Some great poets have ventured
upon this intentionally; few have been successful in it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account