The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
_Phil._—It seems that you hold individuality to be so noble, so perfect,
so incomparable, that there can be nothing superior to it; you therefore
would not like to exchange it for another one, though in that, you could
live with greater ease and perfection.
_Thras._—Let my individuality be as it may, it is always myself. It is
I—I myself—who want to be. That is the individuality which I insist
upon, and not such a one as needs argument to convince me that it may be
my own or a better one.
_Phil._—Only look about you! That which cries out—“I, I myself, wish to
exist”—that is not yourself alone, but all that has the least vestige of
consciousness. Hence this desire of yours, is just that which is not
individual, but common rather to all without exception; it does not
originate in individuality, but in the very nature of existence itself;
it is essential to anybody who lives, nay, it is that through which it
is at all; it seems to belong only to the individual because it can
become conscious only in the individual. What cries in us so loud for
existence, does so only through the mediation of the individual;
immediately and essentially it is the _will_ to exist or to live, and
this _will_ is one and the same in all of us. Our existence being only
the free work of the will, existence can never fail to belong to it, as
far, at least, as that eternally dissatisfied will, _can_ be satisfied.
The individualities are indifferent to the will; it never speaks of
them; though it seems to the individual, who, in himself is the
immediate percipient of it, as if it spoke only of his own
individuality. The consequence is, that the individual cares for his own
existence with so great anxiety, and that he thereby secures the
preservation of his kind. Hence it follows that individuality is no
perfection, but rather a restriction or imperfection; to get rid of it
is not a loss but a gain. Hence, if you would not appear at once
childish and ridiculous, you should abandon that care for mere
individuality; for childish and ridiculous it will appear when you
perceive your own essence to be the universal will to live.
_Thras._—You yourself and all philosophers are childish and ridiculous,
and in fact it is only for a momentary diversion that a man of good
common sense ever consents to squander away an idle hour with the like
of you. I leave your talk for weightier matters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account