The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
These Irish, who settled southern New Hampshire—the pioneers in the
march of civilization—became the establishers and defenders of popular
government here; their blood, transmitted to the generation following
them, produced patriots who stood as a secure bulwark in defense of the
political structure their forefathers had reared; thus, Irishmen have
been identified with every movement in our state history from the time
when the Irishman Darby Field discovered the White Mountains (naming
them after Slieve Bawn or White Hills, in the barony of South
Ballintubber, County Roscommon, Ireland) down to the present day. I
cannot in this brief sketch refer to the part played by men of Irish
descent such as Gen. John Stark, Gen. John Sullivan, Gen. James Miller,
Col. Hercules Mooney and hundreds of others, who have left their impress
upon the annals of our commonwealth. In the history of our state and
nation one thing is satisfactorily settled and entirely clear, namely,
that where Irish blood is found, there you will find true, unflinching,
uncompromising defenders of the honor and integrity of our government
and laws. The late Judge Jeremiah S. Black once said: “I have seen black
swans, and have heard of white crows, but an Irish traitor to American
liberty I never saw nor even heard of.”
These early Irish settlers were, in their religious belief,
uncompromisingly rigid Presbyterians of the strictest stamp.[15] Their
progeny, however, have almost entirely abandoned that severe old
doctrine for the, so called, liberal modern modes of worship. However
well anchored these old timers may have been in their religious belief,
it seemingly was not such as commended itself to their posterity,[16]
and today we find no church of their denomination in this section, and
indeed comparatively few in the state.
In 1799 the disaffection in Peterborough with the old mode of
Presbyterian worship took tangible form; it was too strict; personal
controversies at first broke out which led to dissensions and the
somewhat easier ritual of Congregationalism attracted a considerable
number, and, having at that time only one church edifice, in the
interest of peace and convenience, communion was served at stated times
in the Presbyterian form and at other times in the Congregational form;
but liberalism was not then satisfied and Unitarianism appeared to claim
its share; with these dissensions came the Baptists and Methodists, then
other religions of modern invention and atheism with no religion at all,
finally shared in the general mix-up; a sort of go-as-you-please
condition, embodying the so-called up-to-date ideas, where each strikes
out a new religion to suit himself, or takes a hand in reforming old
notions, until the original anchorage was abandoned and entirely new
dogmas were substituted for the old.[17]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account