The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
None of these old Irish settlers were Catholics, far from it; but the
Catholic Church, which they abhorred, was destined to flourish and grow
in the town they established, and today that church has a resident
priest and the largest religious congregation in Peterborough.
But the religion of these Irish settlers is not important in our present
inquiry; I merely mention it in passing. We are not asking whether they
were Catholics or Presbyterians, Whigs or Tories, but are dealing with
the more pertinent inquiry—from a cosmopolitan standpoint at
least—namely, the nationality of the men who brought civilization to
this section.
While many of us may not indeed agree with all their religious ideas, we
cannot but admire their sterling qualities and take a racial pride in
the fact that the land from which they and their forefathers came, was
the same land from which we and our forefathers came; a land where the
people possessed the fear of God, and clung to virtue, fidelity and
patriotism as cardinal principles; a people having the courage,
constancy and industry necessary for successful pioneers in this new
country.
They were in no sense “Irish Scots” or “Scotch-Irish,” but Irishmen pure
and simple; Irishmen to the manor born; Irishmen by origin, ancestry,
sentiment, names, education and tradition; Irishmen with all the
manners, traits and characteristics of the Irish. This name
“Scotch-Irish” is of modern invention. Why did it not exist in writings
of years ago? Simply because these Irishmen claimed no Scotch
relationship.
I verily believe that if a person had called one of these hardy Irishmen
a Scotch-Irishman, he would have received the same treatment Rev. James
McGregor dealt out, when an impertinent fellow replied to the parson,
that “Nothing saved him but his cloth,” he immediately threw off his
coat and squared himself for action, saying, “It shall not protect you,
sir,” and gave the fellow a thrashing.
In these latter days, as the late lamented Col. John C. Linehan well
said, a new school of writers has sprung up, whose pride of ancestry
outstrips their knowledge, and whose prejudices blind their love of
truth. With the difference in religion between certain sections of the
Irish people as a basis, they are bent on creating a new race,
christening it “Scotch-Irish,” laboring hard to prove that it is a
“brand” superior to either of the two old types, and while clinging to
the Scotch root, claim that their ancestors were different from the
Irish in blood, morals, language and religion.
This is a question not difficult to settle for those who are disposed to
treat it honestly, but, as a rule, the writers who are the most
prolific, as well as the speakers who are the most eloquent, appear to
know the least about the subject, and care less, if they can only
succeed in having their theories accepted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account