The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
Surprise, naturally, might be expressed that Lee, elected as a
“Republican enemy to an aristocratic constitution,” should have taken
the lead in advocating titles. Light is thrown on the situation from the
following entry in Maclay’s journal under date of May 15, 1789: “Lee has
a cultivated understanding, great practice in public business.... He has
acted as a high priest through the whole of this idolatrous business....
Had it not been for Mr. Lee I am firmly convinced no other man would
have ventured to follow our Vice-President. But Lee led, Ellsworth
seconded him, the New England men followed and Ralph Izard [Senator from
South Carolina] joined them but really _haud passibus aequis_, for he
was only for the title of ‘Excellency,’ which had been sanctified by
use.
[Illustration:
UNITED STATES SENATOR ROBERT JACKSON GAMBLE.
Vice-President of the Society
for South Dakota.
]
“It is easy to see what his [Lee’s] aim is. By flattering the President
of the Senate he hopes to govern all the members from New England and
with a little assistance from Carolina or Georgia, to be absolute in the
Senate. Ellsworth and some more of the New England men flatter him in
turn, expecting he will be with them on the question of residence [of
Congress]. Had it not been for our Vice-President and Lee I am convinced
the Senate would have been as adverse to titles as the House of
Representatives. The game that our Vice-President and Mr. Lee appear to
have now in view is to separate the Senate as much as possible from the
House of Representatives. Our Vice-President’s doctrine is that all
honors and titles should flow from the President and Senate only.”
VIII.
THE GREAT DEBATE OF MAY 8, 1789.
But whatever Lee’s motives may have been, it is indisputable that he
threw his great weight and splendid abilities in favor of titles. In the
momentous debate of May 8 he declared that all the world, civilized and
savage, called for titles; that there must be something in human nature
that occasioned this general consent and, therefore, he conceived it was
right. “Here he began,” records Maclay, “to enumerate many, many nations
who gave titles—such as Venice, Genoa and others. The Greeks and Romans,
it was said, had no titles, ‘but’ (making a profound bow to the Chair)
‘you were pleased to set us right in this with respect to the Conscript
Fathers the other day.’ Here he repeated the Vice-President’s speech of
the 23d ultimo almost verbatim all over.
“Mr. Ellsworth rose. He had a paper in his hat which he looked
constantly at. He repeated almost all that Mr. Lee had said but got on
the subject of kings—declared that the sentence in the primer of _fear
God and honor the king_ was of great importance; that kings were of
divine appointment; that Saul, the head and shoulders taller than the
rest of the people, was elected by God and anointed by his appointment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account