The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
“I sat after he had done for a considerable time to see if anybody would
rise. At last I got up and first answered Lee as well as I could with
nearly the same arguments, drawn from the Constitution, as I had used on
the 23d ult. I mentioned that within the space of twenty years back,
more light had been thrown on the subject of governments and on human
affairs in general than for several generations before; that this light
of knowledge had diminished the veneration for titles and that mankind
now considered themselves as little bound to imitate the follies of
civilized nations as the brutalities of savages; that the abuse of power
and the fear of bloody masters had extorted titles as well as adoration,
in some instances from the trembling crowd; that the impression now on
the minds of the citizens of these states was that of horror for kingly
authority.
“Izard got up. He dwelt almost entirely on the antiquity of kingly
government. He could not, however, well get farther back than Philip of
Macedon. He seemed to have forgot both Homer and the Bible. He urged for
something equivalent to nobility having been common among the Romans,
for they had three names that seemed to answer to honorable or something
like it, before and something behind. He did not say Esquire. Mr.
Carroll rose and took my side of the question. He followed nearly the
track I had been in and dwelt much on the information that was now
abroad in the world. He spoke against kings.
“Mr. Lee and Mr. Izard were both up again. Ellsworth was up again.
Langdon was up several times but spoke short each time. Paterson was up
but there was no knowing which side he was of. Mr. Lee considered him as
against him and answered him—but Paterson finally voted with Lee. The
Vice-President repeatedly helped the speakers for titles. Ellsworth was
enumerating how common the appellation of President was. The
Vice-President put him in mind that there were presidents of fire
companies and of a cricket club. Mr. Lee, at another time, was saying he
believed some of the states authorized titles by their constitutions.
The Vice-President, from the chair, told him that Connecticut did it. At
sundry other times he interfered in a like manner. I had been frequently
up to answer new points during the debate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account