The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
On the day preceding this debate the Speaker Muhlenberg of the House of
Representatives had accosted Maclay as “Your Highness of the Senate,”
saying that Congressman Henry Wynkoop, of Pennsylvania, had been
christened by them “His Highness of the Lower House.” As the question of
titles was gone all over again, Maclay records that he determined to try
what ridicule would do. He said: “Mr. President, if all men were of one
stature, there would be neither high nor low. Highness, when applied to
an individual, must naturally denote the excess of stature which he
possesses over other men. An honorable member [Ellsworth] told us the
other day of a certain king [Saul] who was a head and shoulders taller
than anybody else. This, more especially when he was gloriously greased
with a great horn of oil, must have rendered him _highly_ conspicuous.
History, too, if I mistake not, will furnish us with an example where a
great Thracian obtained the empire of the world from no other
circumstance. But, if this antiquated principle is to be adopted, give
us fair play. Let America be searched and it is most probable that the
honor will be found to belong to some huge Patagonian. This is indeed
putting one sadly over the head of another. True, but Nature has done it
and men should see where she leads before they adopt her as a guide.
“It may be said that this business is metaphorical and the high station
of the President entitled him to it. Nothing can be true metaphorically
which is not so naturally, and under this view of the proposed title it
belongs with more propriety to the man in the moon than anybody else as
his station (when we have the honor of seeing him) is certainly the most
exalted of any we know of. Gentlemen may say this is fanciful. Would
they wish to see the subject in the most serious point of view that it
is possible to place it? Rome, after being benighted for ages in the
darkest gloom of ecclesiastical and aristocratic tyranny, beheld a
reformer [Rienzi] in the fourteenth century who, preaching from stocks
and stones and the busts and fragments of ancient heroes, lighted up the
lamp of liberty to meridium splendor. Intoxicated with success, he
assumed a string of titles, none of which, in my recollection, was
equally absurd with the one before you; in consequence of which and of
his aping some other symbols of nobility and royalty, he fell and pulled
down the whole republican structure along with him; marking particularly
the subject of titles as one of the principal rocks on which he was
shipwrecked. As to the latter part of the title, I would only observe
that the power of war is the organ of protection. This is placed in
Congress by the Constitution. Any attempt to divest them of it, even
with George Washington, is treason against the United States or, at
least, a violation of the Constitution.”
XVI.
SENATE FAVORS TITLES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account