The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910 — John Shaqi
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
William Penn was the Father of Religious Liberty in America, and it was
founded in Philadelphia, not elsewhere.
But a more important statement which is common belief among us Irish and
is constantly repeated, but which has no foundation in fact, is that
one-half of the Revolutionary Army was Irish, and Joseph Galloway is
quoted as proof of that.
Dr. Sullivan has only to go to the library and get a copy of the
Examination of Joseph Galloway by a Committee of the House of Commons,
and he will find that, upon his making the statement the Doctor has
recited, Galloway was asked how he knew that. His reply was, “By the
deserters that came in.”
I might state that previous to the Revolutionary War, Joseph Galloway
had been Speaker in the Assembly. When Sir William Howe took possession
of the city of Philadelphia, Joseph Galloway, having gone over to the
British side, was appointed Superintendent of the City by him.
And I would say that, if the question as to what proportion of the
Revolutionary Army was made up of men of our race is to be asked, we are
the ones who should answer it, and not let our enemies do it. Therefore,
I have always objected to that statement of Joseph Galloway’s. It is not
exactly true, for I secured his report giving figures of deserters of
Washington’s army at Valley Forge, and the galleys in the Delaware
River. It was about forty-five per cent., not fifty.
But I ask the members not to have that statement published. Joseph
Galloway was a deserter from the cause of Liberty and went over to the
British. When he was before the committee of the House of Commons he
made that statement; but we do not give the answer he made when
questioned as to how he knew. It is unfair to have that answer produced
against us when we make the statement that one-half of the Revolutionary
Army was Irish.
While all the State forces and the Continental Army were largely Irish,
I have no belief whatever that one-half of the Revolutionary Army was at
any time composed of natives of Ireland. We ought not to assert that it
was because we cannot prove it. Nothing should appear in our official
proceedings but what we can prove if called upon to do so.
That is why I speak for accuracy in all statements. I would ask that
those two, with any others that may be found, be stricken out or
revised, and that all the papers be submitted for criticism so that
nothing will appear in the records of the American-Irish Historical
Society but what we can submit to the country as well-founded. But those
statements relative to Joseph Galloway and William Penn and James Logan
ought to be revised.
DR. QUINLAN: I think it is certainly befitting that we should go before
the world as correct historians, and not state facts unless
well-founded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account