The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
[85] (This plan had been concerted among the deputations or
members thereof, from Con^t N. Y. N. J. Del. and perhaps M^r
Martin from Mary^d who made with them a common cause though
on different principles. Con^t & N. Y. were ag^{st} a
departure from the principle of the Confederation, wishing
rather to add a few new powers to Cong^s than to substitute,
a National Gov^t. The States of N. J. & Del. were opposed to
a National Gov^t because its patrons considered a
proportional representation of the States as the basis of
it. The eagerness displayed by the members opposed to a
Nat^l Gov^t from these different motives began now to
produce serious anxiety for the result of the Convention.
M^r Dickenson said to M^r Madison You see the consequence of
pushing things too far. Some of the members from the small
States wish for two branches in the General Legislature, and
are friends to a good National Government; but we would
sooner submit to foreign power, than submit to be deprived
of an equality of suffrage in both branches of the
legislature, and thereby be thrown under the domination of
the large States.)--Madison Note.
"Mr. Madison moved for the report of the committee, and the
question may then come on whether the convention will
postpone it in order to take into consideration the system
now offered.
"Mr. Lansing is of opinion that the two systems are fairly
contrasted. The one now offered is on the basis of amending
the federal government, and the other to be reported as a
national government, on propositions which exclude the
propriety of amendment. Considering therefore its
importance, and that justice may be done to its weighty
consideration, he is for postponing it a day.
"Col. Hamilton cannot say he is in sentiment with either
plan--supposes both might again be considered as federal
plans, and by this means they will be fairly in committee,
and be contrasted so as to make a comparative estimate of
the two."--Yates, _Secret Proceedings_, etc., 121, 122.
The propositions from N. Jersey moved by M^r Patterson were in the words
following.
1. Res^d that the articles of Confederation ought to be so
revised, corrected, & enlarged, as to render the federal
Constitution adequate to the exigencies of Government, & the
preservation of the Union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account