The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1 — John Shaqi
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
[19] "M^r King is a Man much distinguished for his eloquence and
great parliamentary talents. He was educated in
Massachusetts, and is said to have good classical as well as
legal knowledge. He has served for three years in the
Congress of the United States with great and deserved
applause, and is at this time high in the confidence and
approbation of his Country-men. This Gentleman is about
thirty three years of age, about five feet ten inches high,
well formed, an handsome face, with a strong expressive Eye,
and a sweet high toned voice. In his public speaking there
is something peculiarly strong and rich in his expression,
clear, and convincing in his arguments, rapid and
irresistible at times in his eloquence but he is not always
equal. His action is natural, swimming, and graceful, but
there is a rudeness of manner sometimes accompanying it. But
take him _tout en semble_, he may with propriety be ranked
among the luminaries of the present Age."--Pierce's Notes,
_Am. Hist. Rev._, iii., 325.
Col. Mason[20] seconded the objection; adding that such a record of the
opinions of members would be an obstacle to a change of them on
conviction; and in case of its being hereafter promulged must furnish
handles to the adversaries of the Result of the Meeting.
[20] "Mr. Mason is a Gentleman of remarkable strong powers, and
possesses a clear and copious understanding. He is able and
convincing in debate, steady and firm in his principles, and
undoubtedly one of the best politicians in America. M^r
Mason is about 60 years old, with a fine strong
constitution."--Pierce's Notes, _Id._, iii., 331.
The proposed rule was rejected nem. contrad certe. The standing
rules[21] agreed to were as follows:[22]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account