The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Alex: Martin[103] seconded the Motion.
[103] "Mr. Martin was lately Governor of North Carolina, which
office he filled with credit. He is a man of sense, and
undoubtedly is a good politician, but he is not formed to
shine in public debate, being no speaker. Mr. Martin was
once a Colonel in the American Army, but proved unfit for
the field. He is about 40 years of age."--Pierce's Notes,
_Am. Hist. Rev._, iii., 332.
M^r Butler. The amend^t does not go far eno. & w^d be easily evaded.
M^r Rutlidge, was for preserving the Legislature as pure as possible, by
shutting the door against appointments of its own members to offices,
which was one source of its corruption.
M^r Mason.[104] The motion of my colleague is but a partial remedy for
the evil. He appealed to him as a witness of the shameful partiality of
the Legislature of Virginia to its own members. He enlarged on the
abuses & corruption in the British Parliament, connected with the
appointment of its members. He c^d not suppose that a sufficient number
of Citizens could not be found who would be ready, without the
inducement of eligibility to offices, to undertake the Legislative
service. Genius & virtue it may be said, ought to be encouraged. Genius,
for aught he knew, might, but that virtue should be encouraged by such a
species of venality, was an idea, that at least had the merit of being
new.
[104] Yates gives Mason's speech more fully and a speech by
Madison omitted here:
"Mr. Mason. I differ from my colleague in his proposed
amendment. Let me state the practice in the state where we
came from. There, all officers are appointed by the
legislature. Need I add, that many of their appointments are
most shameful. Nor will the check proposed by this amendment
be sufficient. It will soon cease to be any check at all. It
is asserted that it will be very difficult to find men
sufficiently qualified as legislators without the inducement
of emolument. I do believe that men of genius will be
deterred unless possessed of great virtues. We may well
dispense with the first characters when destitute of
virtue--I should wish them never to come forward--But if we
do not provide against corruption, our government will soon
be at an end; nor would I wish to put a man of virtue in the
way of temptation. Evasions and caballing would evade the
amendment. Nor would the danger be less, if the executive
has the appointment of officers. The first three or four
years we might go on well enough; but what would be the case
afterwards? I will add, that such a government ought to be
refused by the people--and it will be refused.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account