The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Wilson could not approve of the section as it stood, and could not
give up his judgment to any supposed objections that might arise among
the people. He considered himself as acting & responsible for the
welfare of millions not immediately represented in this House. He had
also asked himself the serious question what he should say to his
constituents in case they should call upon him to tell them why he
sacrificed his own Judgment in a case where they authorized him to
exercise it? Were he to own to them that he sacrificed it in order to
flatter their prejudices, he should dread the retort: did you suppose
the people of Penn^a had not good sense enough to receive a good
Government? Under this impression he should certainly follow his own
Judgment which disapproved of the section. He would remark in addition
to the objections urged ag^{st} it, that as one branch of the
Legislature was to be appointed by the Legislatures of the States, the
other by the people of the States, as both are to be paid by the States,
and to be appointable to State offices, nothing seemed to be wanting to
prostrate the Nat^l Legislature, but to render its members ineligible to
Nat^l offices, & by that means take away its power of attracting those
talents which were necessary to give weight to the Govern^t and to
render it useful to the people. He was far from thinking the ambition
which aspired to Offices of dignity and trust, an ignoble or culpable
one. He was sure it was not politic to regard it in that light, or to
withhold from it the prospect of those rewards, which might engage it in
the career of public service. He observed that the State of Penn^a which
had gone as far as any State into the policy of fettering power, had not
rendered the members of the Legislature ineligible to offices of Gov^t.
M^r Elsworth did not think the mere postponement of the reward would be
any material discouragement of merit. Ambitious minds will serve 2 years
or 7 years in the Legislature for the sake of qualifying themselves for
other offices. This he thought a sufficient security for obtaining the
services of the ablest men in the Legislature, although whilst members
they should be ineligible to Public offices. Besides, merit will be most
encouraged, when most impartially rewarded. If rewards are to circulate
only within the Legislature, merit out of it will be discouraged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account