The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Wilson was decidedly ag^{st} prohibiting general taxes on exports.
He dwelt on the injustice and impolicy of leaving N. Jersey Connecticut
&c. any longer subject to the exactions of their commercial neighbours.
M^r Gerry thought the legislature could not be trusted with such a
power. It might ruin the Country. It might be exercised partially,
raising one and depressing another part of it.
M^r Gov^r Morris. However the legislative power may be formed, it will
if disposed be able to ruin the Country. He considered the taxing of
exports to be in many cases highly politic. Virginia has found her
account in taxing Tobacco. All Countries having peculiar articles tax
the exportation of them; as France her wines and brandies. A tax here on
lumber, would fall on the W. Indies & punish their restrictions on our
trade. The same is true of live stock and in some degree of flour. In
case of a dearth in the West Indies, we may extort what we please. Taxes
on exports are a necessary source of revenue. For a long time the people
of America will not have money to pay direct taxes. Seize and sell their
effects and you push them into Revolts.
M^r Mercer was strenuous against giving Congress power to tax exports.
Such taxes are impolitic, as encouraging the raising of articles not
meant for exportation. The States had now a right where their situation
permitted, to tax both the imports and the exports of their uncommercial
neighbours. It was enough for them to sacrifice one half of it. It had
been said the Southern States had most need of naval protection. The
reverse was the case. Were it not for promoting the carrying trade of
the North^n States, the South^n States could let the trade go into
foreign bottoms, where it would not need our protection. Virginia by
taxing her tobacco had given an advantage to that of Maryland.
M^r Sherman. To examine and compare the States in relation to imports
and exports will be opening a boundless field. He thought the matter had
been adjusted, and that imports were to be subject, and exports not, to
be taxed. He thought it wrong to tax exports except it might be such
articles as ought not to be exported. The complexity of the business in
America would render an equal tax on exports impracticable. The
oppression of the uncommercial States was guarded ag^{st} by the power
to regulate trade between the States. As to compelling foreigners, that
might be done by regulating trade in general. The Government would not
be trusted with such a power. Objections are most likely to be excited
by considerations relating to taxes & money. A power to tax exports
would shipwreck the whole.
M^r Carrol was surprised that any objection should be made to an
exception of exports from the power of taxation.
It was finally agreed that the question concerning exports sh^d lie over
for the place in which the exception stood in the report: Mary^d alone
voting ag^{st} it.
Sect: 1. (Art. VII) agreed to; M^r Gerry alone answering, no.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account