The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Mason urged the necessity of connecting with the power of levying
taxes duties &c., the prohibition in Sect. 4 Art. VI that no tax should
be laid on exports. He was unwilling to trust to its being done in a
future article. He hoped the North^n States did not mean to deny the
Southern this security. It would hereafter be as desirable to the former
when the latter should become the most populous. He professed his
jealousy for the productions of the Southern or as he called them, the
staple States. He moved to insert the following amendment: "provided
that no tax duty or imposition shall be laid by the Legislature of the
U. States on articles exported from any State."
M^r Sherman had no objection to the proviso here, other than it would
derange the parts of the report as made by the Committee, to take them
in such an order.
M^r Rutlidge. It being of no consequence in what order points are
decided, he should vote for the clause as it stood, but on condition
that the subsequent part relating to negroes should also be agreed to.
M^r Governeur Morris considered such a proviso as inadmissible any
where. It was so radically objectionable, that it might cost the whole
system the support of some members. He contended that it would not in
some cases be equitable to tax imports without taxing exports; and that
taxes on exports would be often the most easy and proper of the two.
M^r Madison. 1. the power of laying taxes on exports is proper in
itself, and as the States cannot with propriety exercise it separately,
it ought to be vested in them collectively. 2. it might with particular
advantage be exercised with regard to articles in which America was not
rivalled in foreign markets, as Tob^o &c. The contract between the
French Farmers Gen^l and M^r Morris stipulating that if taxes s^d be
laid in america on the export of Tob^o they s^d be paid by the Farmers,
shewed that it was understood by them, that the price would be thereby
raised in America, and consequently the taxes be paid by the European
Consumer. 3. it would be unjust to the States whose produce was exported
by their neighbours, to leave it subject to be taxed by the latter. This
was a grievance which had already filled N.H. Con^t N. Jer^y Del: and N.
Carolina with loud complaints, as it related to imports, and they would
be equally authorized by taxes by the States on exports. 4. The South^n
States being most in danger and most needing naval protection, could the
less complain if the burthen should be somewhat heaviest on them. 5. we
are not providing for the present moment only, and time will equalize
the situation of the States in this matter. He was for these reasons
ag^{st} the motion.
M^r Williamson considered the clause proposed ag^{st} taxes on exports
as reasonable and necessary.
M^r Elseworth was ag^{st} Taxing exports; but thought the prohibition
stood in the most proper place, and was ag^{st} deranging the order
reported by the Committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account