The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Madison moved to strike out "and punishment &c."
M^r Mason doubts the safety of it, considering the strict rule of
construction in criminal cases. He doubted also the propriety of taking
the power in all these cases wholly from the States.
M^r Govern^r Morris thought it would be necessary to extend the
authority further, so as to provide for the punishment of counterfeiting
in general. Bills of exchange for example might be forged in one State
and carried into another.
It was suggested by some other member that _foreign_ paper might be
counterfeited by Citizens; and that it might be politic to provide by
national authority for the punishment of it.
M^r Randolph did not conceive that expunging "the punishment" would be a
constructive exclusion of the power. He doubted only the efficacy of the
word "declare."
M^r Wilson was in favor of the motion. Strictness was not necessary in
giving authority to enact penal laws; though necessary in enacting &
expounding them.
On motion for striking out "and punishment" as moved by M^r Madison
N.H. no. Mass. ay. C^t no. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d no. V^a ay.
N.C. ay. S.C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r Gov^r Morris moved to strike out "declare the law" and insert
"punish" before "piracies," and on the question.
N.H. ay. Mass. ay. C^t no. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d ay. V^a no.
N.C. no. S.C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r Madison & M^r Randolph moved to insert "define &," before "punish."
M^r Wilson thought "felonies" sufficiently defined by common law.
M^r Dickenson concurred with M^r Wilson.
M^r Mercer was in favor of the amendment.
M^r Madison. Felony at common law is vague. It is also defective. One
defect is supplied by Stat: of Anne as to running away with vessels
which at co[~m]on law was a breach of trust only. Besides no foreign law
should be a standard farther than is expressly adopted. If the laws of
the States were to prevail on this subject, the Citizens of different
States would be subject to different punishments for the same offence at
Sea. There would be neither uniformity nor stability in the law--The
proper remedy for all these difficulties was to vest the power proposed
by the term "define" in the Nat^l legislature.
M^r Gov^r Morris would prefer _designate_ to _define_, the latter being
as he conceived, limited to the preexisting meaning.
It was said by others to be applicable to the creating of offences also,
and therefore suited the case both of felonies & of piracies. The motion
of M^r M. & M^r R. was agreed to.
M^r Elseworth enlarged the motion so as to read "to define and punish
piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, counterfeiting the
securities and current coin of the U. States, and offences ag^{st} the
law of Nations" which was agreed to nem. con.
"To subdue a rebellion in any State, on the application of its
legislature"
M^r Pinkney moved to strike out, "on the application of its
legislature".
M^r Gov^r Morris 2^{ds}.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account