The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Mason was much attached to the principle, but was afraid such a
fetter might be dangerous in time of war. He suggested the necessity of
preventing the danger of perpetual revenue which must of necessity
subvert the liberty of any country. If it be objected to on the
principle of M^r Rutlidge's motion that public Credit may require
perpetual provisions, that case might be excepted; it being declared
that in other cases, no taxes should be laid for a longer term than ----
years. He considered the caution observed in Great Britain on this point
as the paladium of public liberty.
M^r Rutlidge's motion was referred--He then moved that a Grand Committee
be appointed to consider the necessity and expediency of the U. States
assuming all the State debts--A regular settlement between the Union &
the several States would never take place. The assumption would be just
as the State debts were contracted in the common defence. It was
necessary, as the taxes on imports the only sure source of revenue were
to be given up to the Union. It was politic, as by disburdening the
people of the State debts it would conciliate them to the plan.
M^r King and M^r Pinkney seconded the motion. (Col. Mason interposed a
motion that the Committee prepare a clause for restraining perpetual
revenue, which was agreed to nem. con.)
M^r Sherman thought it would be better to authorize the Legislature to
assume the State debts, than to say positively it should be done. He
considered the measure as just and that it would have a good effect to
say something about the matter.
M^r Elseworth differed from M^r Sherman. As far as the State debts ought
in equity to be assumed, he conceived that they might and would be so.
M^r Pinkney observed that a great part of the State debts were of such a
nature that although in point of policy and true equity they ought, yet
would they not be viewed in the light of federal expenditures.
M^r King thought the matter of more consequence than M^r Elseworth
seemed to do; and that it was well worthy of commitment. Besides the
considerations of justice and policy which had been mentioned, it might
be remarked that the State Creditors an active and formidable party
would otherwise be opposed to a plan which transferred to the Union the
best resources of the States without transferring the State debts at the
same time. The State Creditors had generally been the strongest foes to
the impost-plan. The State debts probably were of greater amount than
the federal. He would not say that it was practicable to consolidate the
debts, but he thought it would be prudent to have the subject considered
by a Committee.
On M^r Rutlidge's motion, that a Com^e be appointed to consider of the
assumption &c.
N. H. no. Mass. ay. C^t ay. N. J. no. P^a div^d. Del. no. M^d
no. V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r Gerry's motion to provide for public securities, for stages on post
roads, and for letters of marque & reprisal, were committed nem. con.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account