The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r King thought the power of taxation given to the Legislature rendered
the motion of M^r Gerry altogether unnecessary.
On M^r Gerry's motion as amended
N. H. no. Mass. ay. C^t no. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no. M^d no.
V^a no. N. C. div^d. S. C. ay. Geo. no.
On a question, Shall Art: VI Sect. 12. with the amendment to it proposed
& entered on the 15 instant, as called for by Col. Mason be now taken
up? It passed in the negative.
N. H. ay. Mass. no. C^t ay. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no. M^d ay.
V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. no.
M^r L. Martin. The power of taxation is most likely to be criticised by
the public. Direct taxation should not be used but in cases of absolute
necessity; and then the States will be the best Judges of the mode. He
therefore moved the following addition to Sect: 3: Art VII "And whenever
the Legislature of the U. S. shall find it necessary that revenue should
be raised by direct taxation, having apportioned the same, according to
the above rule on the several States, requisitions shall be made of the
respective States to pay into the Continental Treasury their respective
quotas within a time in the said requisitions specified; and in case of
any of the States failing to comply with such requisitions, then and
then only to devise and pass acts directing the mode, and authorizing
the collection of the same."
M^r M^cHenry 2^{ded} the motion--there was no debate, and on the
question
N. H. no. C^t no. N. J. ay. Pen^a no. Del. no. M^d div^d.
(Jenifer & Carol no) V^a no. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.
Art. VII. Sect. 4.--M^r Langdon, by this section the States are left at
liberty to tax exports. N. H. therefore with other non-exporting States,
will be subject to be taxed by the States exporting its produce. This
could not be admitted. It seems to be feared that the Northern States
will oppress the trade of the South^n. This may be guarded ag^{st} by
requiring the concurrence of 2/3 or 3/4 of the legislature in such
cases.
M^r Elseworth. It is best as it stands. The power of regulating trade
between the States will protect them ag^{st} each other. Should this not
be the case, the attempts of one to tax the produce of another passing
through its hands, will force a direct exportation and defeat
themselves. There are solid reasons ag^{st} Cong^s taxing exports. 1. it
will discourage industry, as taxes on imports discourage luxury. 2. The
produce of different States is such as to prevent uniformity in such
taxes. There are indeed but a few articles that could be taxed at all;
as Tob^o rice & indigo, and a tax on these alone would be partial &
unjust. 3. The taxing of exports would engender incurable jealousies.
M^r Williamson. Tho' N. C. has been taxed by Virg^a by a duty on 12000
Hhs of her Tob^o exported thro' Virg^a yet he would never agree to this
power. Should it take place, it would destroy the last hope of an
adoption of the plan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account