The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Dickenson considered it as inadmissible on every principle of honor
& safety that the importation of slaves should be authorized to the
States by the Constitution. The true question was whether the national
happiness would be promoted or impeded by the importation, and this
question ought to be left to the National Gov^t not to the States
particularly interested. If Eng^d & France permit slavery, slaves are at
the same time excluded from both those kingdoms. Greece and Rome were
made unhappy by their slaves. He could not believe that the South^n
States would refuse to confederate on the account apprehended;
especially as the power was not likely to be immediately exercised by
the Gen^l Government.
M^r Williamson stated the law of N. Carolina on the subject, to-wit that
it did not directly prohibit the importation of slaves. It imposed a
duty of £5 on each slave imported from Africa, £10 on each from
elsewhere, & £50 on each from a State licensing manumission. He thought
the S. States could not be members of the Union if the clause sh^d be
rejected, and that it was wrong to force any thing down not absolutely
necessary, and which any State must disagree to.
M^r King thought the subject should be considered in a political light
only. If two States will not agree to the Constitution as stated on one
side, he could affirm with equal belief on the other, that great & equal
opposition would be experienced from the other States. He remarked on
the exemption of slaves from duty whilst every other import was
subjected to it, as an inequality that could not fail to strike the
commercial sagacity of the North^n & Middle States.
M^r Langdon was strenuous for giving the power to the Gen^l Gov^t. He
c^d not with a good conscience leave it with the States who could then
go on with the traffic, without being restrained by the opinions here
given that they will themselves cease to import slaves.
Gen^l Pinkney thought himself bound to declare candidly that he did not
think S. Carolina would stop her importations of slaves in any short
time, but only stop them occasionally as she now does. He moved to
commit the clause that slaves might be made liable to an equal tax with
other imports which he thought right & w^{ch} w^d remove one difficulty
that had been started.
M^r Rutlidge. If the Convention thinks that N. C. S. C. & Georgia will
ever agree to the plan, unless their right to import slaves be
untouched, the expectation is vain. The people of those States will
never be such fools as to give up so important an interest. He was
strenuous ag^{st} striking out the section, and seconded the motion of
Gen^l Pinkney for a commitment.
M^r Gov^r Morris wished the whole subject to be committed including the
clauses relating to taxes on exports & to a navigation act. These things
may form a bargain among the Northern & Southern States.
M^r Butler declared that he never would agree to the power of taxing
exports.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account