The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Madison opposed the motion, insisting that the Western States
neither would nor ought to submit to a union which degraded them from an
equal rank with the other States.
Col: Mason. If it were possible by just means to prevent emigrations to
the Western Country, it might be good policy. But go the people will as
they find it for their interest, and the best policy is to treat them
with that equality which will make them friends not enemies.
M^r Gov^r Morris did not mean to discourage the growth of the Western
Country. He knew that to be impossible. He did not wish however to throw
the power into their hands.
M^r Sherman, was ag^{st} the motion & for fixing an equality of
privileges by the Constitution.
M^r Langdon was in favor of the motion, he did not know but
circumstances might arise which would render it inconvenient to admit
new States on terms of equality.
M^r Williamson was for leaving the Legislature free. The existing
_small_ States enjoy an equality now, and for _that_ reason are admitted
to it in the Senate. This reason is not applicable to new Western
States.
On M^r Gov^r Morris's motion for striking out.
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. C^t ay. N. J. ay. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d no.
V^a no. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r L. Martin & M^r Gov^r Morris moved to strike out of art XVII, "but
to such admission the consent of two thirds of the members present shall
be necessary." Before any question was taken on this motion,
M^r Gov^r Morris moved the following proposition as a substitute for the
XVII Art:
"New States may be admitted by the Legislature into this Union;
but no new State shall be erected within the limits of any of
the present States, without the consent of the Legislature of
such State, as well as of the Gen^l Legislature."
The first part to Union inclusive was agreed to nem: con:
M^r L. Martin opposed the latter part. Nothing he said would so alarm
the limited States as to make the consent of the large States claiming
the Western lands, necessary to the establishment of new States within
their limits. It is proposed to guarantee the States. Shall Vermont be
reduced by force in favor of the States claiming it? Frankland & the
Western county of Virginia were in a like situation.
On M^r Gov^r Morris's motion to substitute &c. it was agreed to.
N. H. no. Mass. ay. C^t no. N. J. no. P^a ay. Del. no. M^d no.
V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
Art: XVII--before the House, as amended.
M^r Sherman was against it. He thought it unnecessary. The Union cannot
dismember a State without its consent.
M^r Langdon thought there was great weight in the argument of M^r Luther
Martin, and that the proposition substituted by M^r Gov^r Morris would
excite a dangerous opposition to the plan.
M^r Gov^r Morris thought on the contrary that the small States would be
pleased with the regulation, as it holds up the idea of dismembering the
large States.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account