The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Randolph & M^r Pinkney wished for a particular explanation &
discussion of the reasons for changing the mode of electing the
Executive.
M^r Gov^r Morris said he would give the reasons of the Committee and his
own. The 1^{st} was the danger of intrigue & faction if the appointm^t
should be made by the Legislature. 2. The inconveniency of an
ineligibility required by that mode in order to lessen its evils. 3. The
difficulty of establishing a Court of Impeachments, other than the
Senate which would not be so proper for the trial nor the other branch
for the impeachment of the President, if appointed by the Legislature.
4. Nobody had appeared to be satisfied with an appointment by the
Legislature. 5. Many were anxious even for an immediate choice by the
people. 6. The indispensable necessity of making the Executive
independent of the Legislature.--As the Electors would vote at the same
time throughout the U. S. and at so great a distance from each other,
the great evil of cabal was avoided. It would be impossible also to
corrupt them. A conclusive reason for making the Senate instead of the
Supreme Court the Judge of impeachments, was that the latter was to try
the President after the trial of the impeachment.
Col: Mason confessed that the plan of the Committee had removed some
capital objections, particularly the danger of cabal and corruption. It
was liable however to this strong objection, that nineteen times in
twenty the President would be chosen by the Senate, an improper body for
the purpose.
M^r Butler thought the mode not free from objections, but much more so
than an election by the Legislature, where as in elective monarchies,
cabal faction & violence would be sure to prevail.
M^r Pinkney stated as objections to the mode 1. that it threw the whole
appointment in fact into the hands of the Senate. 2. The Electors will
be strangers to the several candidates and of course unable to decide on
their comparative merits. 3. It makes the Executive reeligible which
will endanger the public liberty. 4. It makes the same body of men which
will in fact elect the President his Judges in case of an impeachment.
M^r Williamson had great doubts whether the advantage of reeligibility
would balance the objection to such a dependence of the President on the
Senate for his reappointment. He thought at least the Senate ought to be
restrained to the _two_ highest on the list.
M^r Gov^r Morris said the principal advantage aimed at was that of
taking away the opportunity for cabal. The President may be made if
thought necessary ineligible on this as well as on any other mode of
election. Other inconveniences may be no less redressed on this plan
than any other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account