The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents
were to report the objections he has had to it, and endeavor to
gain partizans in support of them, we might prevent its being
generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary effects &
great advantages resulting naturally in our favor among foreign
nations as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent
unanimity. Much of the strength & efficiency of any Government
in procuring and securing happiness to the people, depends, on
opinion, on the general opinion of the goodness of the
Government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity of its
Governors. I hope therefore that for our own sakes as a part of
the people, and for the sake of posterity, we shall act heartily
and unanimously in recommending this Constitution (if approved
by Congress & confirmed by the Conventions) wherever our
influence may extend, and turn our future thoughts & endeavors
to the means of having it well administered.
On the whole, Sir, I cannot help expressing a wish that every
member of the Convention who may still have objections to it,
would with me, on this occasion doubt a little of his own
infallibility, and to make manifest our unanimity, put his name
to this instrument.--He then moved that the Constitution be
signed by the members and offered the following as a convenient
form viz: "Done in Convention by the unanimous consent of _the
States_ present the 17^{th} of Sep^r &c.--In witness whereof we
have hereunto subscribed our names."
This ambiguous form had been drawn up by M^r G. M. in order to gain the
dissenting members, and put into the hands of Doc^r Franklin that it
might have the better chance of success.
M^r Gorham said if it was not too late he could wish, for the purpose of
lessening objections to the Constitution, that the clause declaring "the
number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every forty thousand"
which had produced so much discussion, might be yet reconsidered, in
order to strike out 40,000 & insert "thirty thousand." This would not he
remarked establish that as an absolute rule, but only give Congress a
greater latitude which could not be thought unreasonable.
M^r King & M^r Carrol seconded & supported the ideas of M^r Gorham.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account