The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2 — John Shaqi
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Ghorum preferred two to three members for the blank. A small number
was most convenient for deciding on peace & war &c. which he expected
would be vested in the 2^d branch. The number of States will also
increase. Kentucky, Vermont, the Province of Mayne & Franklin will
probably soon be added to the present number. He presumed also that some
of the largest States would be divided. The strength of the General
Gov^t will lie not in the largeness, but in the smallness of the States.
Col. Mason thought 3 from each State including new States would make the
2^d branch too numerous. Besides other objections, the additional
expence ought always to form one, where it was not absolutely necessary.
M^r Williamson. If the number be too great, the distant States will not
be on an equal footing with the nearer States. The latter can more
easily send & support their ablest Citizens. He approved of the voting
per capita.
On the question for filling the blank with "_three_"
N. H. no. Mass. no. Con^t no. P^a ay. Del. no. V^a no. N. C. no.
S. C. no. Geo. no.
On question for filling it with "two." Agreed to nem. con.
M^r L Martin was opposed to voting per Capita, as departing from the
idea of the _States_ being represented in the 2^d branch.
M^r Carroll,[7] was not struck with any particular objection ag^{st} the
mode; but he did not wish so hastily to make so material an innovation.
[7] "Mr. Carrol is a Man of large fortune, and influence in his
State. He possesses plain good sense, and is in the full
confidence of his Countrymen. This Gentleman is about
[blank] years of age."--Pierce's Notes, _Am. Hist. Rev._,
iii., 330.
On the question on the whole motion viz. the 2^d b. to consist of 2
members from each State and to vote per Capita,
N. H. ay. Mass. ay. C^t ay. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d no. V^a ay. N.
C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r Houston[8] & M^r Spaight moved "that the appointment of the
Executive by Electors chosen by the Legislatures of the States, be
reconsidered." M^r Houston urged the extreme inconveniency & the
considerable expence, of drawing together men from all the States for
the single purpose of electing the Chief Magistrate.
[8] "Mr. Houston is an Attorney at Law, and has been Member of
Congress for the State of Georgia. He is a Gentleman of
Family, and was educated in England. As to his legal or
political knowledge he has very little to boast of. Nature
seems to have done more for his corporeal than mental
powers. His Person is striking, but his mind very little
improved with useful or elegant knowledge. He has none of
the talents requisite for the Orator, but in public debate
is confused and irregular. Mr. Houston is about 30 years of
age of an amiable and sweet temper, and of good and
honorable principles."--Pierce's Notes, _Am. Hist. Rev._,
iii., 334.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account