The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
Col. Mason. We all feel too strongly the remains of antient prejudices,
and view things too much through a British medium. A Freehold is the
qualification in England, & hence it is imagined to be the only proper
one. The true idea in his opinion was that every man having evidence of
attachment to & permanent common interest with the Society ought to
share in all its rights & privileges. Was this qualification restrained
to freeholders? Does no other kind of property but land evidence a
common interest in the proprietor? does nothing besides property mark a
permanent attachment. Ought the merchant, the monied man, the parent of
a number of children whose fortunes are to be pursued in his own Country
to be viewed as suspicious characters, and unworthy to be trusted with
the common rights of their fellow Citizens.
M^r Madison. the right of suffrage is certainly one of the fundamental
articles of republican Government, and ought not to be left to be
regulated by the Legislature. A gradual abridgment of this right has
been the mode in which aristocracies have been built on the ruins of
popular forms. Whether the Constitutional qualification ought to be a
freehold, would with him depend much on the probable reception such a
change would meet with in States where the right was now exercised by
every description of people. In several of the States a freehold was now
the qualification. Viewing the subject in its merits alone, the
freeholders of the Country would be the safest depositories of
Republican liberty. In future times a great majority of the people will
not only be without landed, but any other sort of property. These will
either combine, under the influence of their common situation: in which
case, the rights of property & the public liberty, will not be secure in
their hands: or which is more probable, they will become the tools of
opulence & ambition, in which case there will be equal danger on another
side. The example of England has been misconceived (by Col. Mason.) A
very small proportion of the Representatives are there chosen by
freeholders. The greatest part are chosen by the Cities & boroughs, in
many of which the qualification of suffrage is as low as it is in any
one of the U. S. and it was in the boroughs & Cities rather than the
Counties, that bribery most prevailed, & the influence of the Crown on
elections was most dangerously exerted.[18]
[18] "Note to speech of J. M. in Convention of 1787, August
7^{th}.:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account