The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Madison was not averse to some restrictions on this subject; but
could never agree to the proposed amendment. He thought any restriction
however in the _Constitution_ unnecessary, and improper, unnecessary;
because the Nat^l Legisl^{re} is to have the right of regulating
naturalization, and can by virtue thereof fix different periods of
residence or conditions of enjoying different privileges of Citizenship:
Improper; because it will give a tincture of illiberality to the
Constitution: because it will put it out of the power of the Nat^l
Legislature even by special acts of naturalization to confer the full
rank of Citizens on meritorious strangers & because it will discourage
the most desirable class of people from emigrating to the U. S. Should
the proposed Constitution have the intended effect of giving stability &
reputation to our Gov^{ts} great numbers of respectable Europeans; men
who love liberty and wish to partake its blessings, will be ready to
transfer their fortunes hither. All such would feel the mortification of
being marked with suspicious incapacitations though they s^d not covet
the public honors. He was not apprehensive that any dangerous number of
strangers would be appointed by the State Legislatures, if they were
left at liberty to do so: nor that foreign powers would make use of
strangers as instruments for their purposes. Their bribes would be
expended on men whose circumstances would rather stifle than excite
jealousy & watchfulness in the public.
M^r Butler was decidedly opposed to the admission of foreigners without
a long residence in the Country. They bring with them, not only
attachments to other Countries; but ideas of Gov^t so distinct from ours
that in every point of view they are dangerous. He acknowledged that if
he himself had been called into public life within a short time after
his coming to America, his foreign habits opinions & attachments would
have rendered him an improper agent in public affairs. He mentioned the
great strictness observed in Great Britain on this subject.
Doc^r Franklin was not against a reasonable time, but should be very
sorry to see any thing like illiberality inserted in the Constitution.
The people in Europe are friendly to this Country. Even in the Country
with which we have been lately at war, we have now & had during the war,
a great many friends not only among the people at large but in both
houses of Parliament. In every other Country in Europe all the people
are our friends. We found in the course of the Revolution, that many
strangers served us faithfully, and that many natives took part ag^{st}
their Country. When foreigners after looking about for some other
Country in which they can obtain more happiness, give a preference to
ours, it is a proof of attachment which ought to excite our confidence &
affection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account